Schlagwort-Archive: reality

In the end

all states will tumble and fall. And every non market money will fall also.

I gave it up to expect sanity in the deledefs minds. They live in a world which still is real, but because they can take whomever they like as hostages, they do not
have to face the reality. They got their money from the states and so it’s “sure”. If they are high enough on the lists of their party they will get re-voted, even if they fail in their
home base. They are invited to talk and well you hardly are very pressing to a guest you have invited or do you put down your guests?

They do not have to base their decisions on voluntarism. They do not have to ask the people if they really should do this or that. They are free to decide to their liking.
You can write letters, petitions you name it, they might read it still chances are high they don’t. If they decide something they can put the while force monopoly behind it. You are robbed through a law.
Well bad luck, if you don’t obey you will go to jail and in extremes you will get expropriated. Nothing new under the sun.

Nobody can stop them to vote for higher taxes (they will not name it higher, but more fair taxes) and in the end you can not stop them to sell of all the citizens to whomever. Yes there are highest courts but well they are not that high a hurdle. E.g everybody in Euro land can know that the ESM is against all democratic rules. But still they can decide for it and the highest court will probably just nod. If they would take it serious they might object, but with a few compromises here and there we are fine. It was done so with the ECB and it was done so with the no-bail-out rule. It was a sine qua no in Germany and still it’s gone and the Bundesverfassungsgericht simply has not done anything about it.

So no it does not pay of to count on rationality with Deledefs. Politics is the art of lying and get through with it. And that’s what nearly all the Deledefs do. The people are corrupted and so the system is corrupted also. So no we can not expect any support for us from our Deledefs. So in the end there’s just one thing on or side, reality. Deledefs can ignore reality for a long time but not forever. You can see that bank-saving, state-saving really has solved the real problem. the massive overhand of credit . We all know how credit expansion must fall, so what we just can do is taking as much of an advantage of the coming break-down as we possibly can. So If I can harm deledefs I happily do that. if I find a while in the tax injustice, I will try to make use of that whole. If I can take advantage of a law in a financial way I will take it. (You remember the PVS stuff I put on my roof?)

I simply have not choice here in Germany any more. I just have shadows of disaster, that’s what I have. There is but one party (which is not in any parliament) I can choose. And it’s unlikely that they will get over the 5 % hurdle. Anyway I will vote for them as long as I can and possibly even join them. I’m quite just sure I will not give into the systematic corruption. I do not want to rule but I also do not want to get ruled. And so I will try my best to bring down this apocalyptic states.

To end the starting of this blog entry let me just write:
In the end, reality will win. Ayn Rand has named the rules. Man has to obey them, all the Austrian economics know, you have to deal with the limits of reality and make the best out of it. Nothing else will work, and it’s clear they are right and all the other are just ignorants.

Some misconceptions from the Greens

I know what I’m writing here is heresy. At least it is for the supposed to rule us well deledefs in Germany. Anyway here we go

Now can we rely on actual an currently working renewable energy? Well the depressing answer is “no”. We can’t . Neither wind nor sun is guaranteed to work every day, every hour. So we always will have strong up-and-downturns. There is not denying there are those gray days where neither one see the sun nor feel the slightest movement of air. And there will always be those day where the sun is burning and the wind storming.

Can we follow this variability. I’m afraid that won’t work either. So no we simply are not that variable with our needs.

So what can we do then? Can we store the electricity. Well to depressing low level yes we can. It might work e.g to keep my computer running with a large enough battery which may keep the currency even for a week or so. Can we do the same for let’s say melting steel? Well no, there is not way of storing away big masses of energy. Yes agreed you can warm water with it and you may use this water to make electricity again. But this really is a big loss and currently nothing on a large scale is available.

So the current unpleasant but nonetheless truth is. We have no reliable way storing away electricity. That’s a simple fact of life which nobody can change immedieatly, so currently if we’d have 100 GW renewable energy we need another 100 GW “traditional” energy, be it gas, coal, oil, nuclear power. So this means we have a need for double the needed energy just in case one half is not available. That is uneconomic to the highest extend, so do we keep all the other conditions the same and let us assume one 1 KWH costs 20 ct. Then we need double the price for one KWH just being able to satisfy our current need for currency.

The other option just can’t be needing half the energy. But that does nor work for electricity. So with all mean the Greens are working against the objective reality, and how should that work? The simply answer is it hadn’t, doesn’t and never will (long term) So either we find a way storing electricity or we must limit other outputs from the industries which have to “be” the reserves. In both cases we need at best double the prices of today. And you can bet hardly anyone will jump on the idea having double his expenses for the same output just because the Greens ignore reality