kann man auf FB finden:
Text:
++ Low Birth Rates: How Developed Countries Can Stop the Greatest Threat to Human Civilization ++Almost unnoticed by the public, one of the greatest crises in human history occurs. It has the potential to destroy for all time a noteworthy part of the human competences that have arisen in an evolutionary way. We are talking about the low birth rates, which most industrialized nations have long been affected by. At the same time, far too many children are often born in developing countries.
Moreover, the better their PISA results are, the lower the birth rates in the countries of the world tend to be. The same correlation applies within the country: the higher the level of education, the fewer offspring people in the industrialized countries have on average. In science, the phenomenon contrary to the expectations of the theory of evolution is called the demographic-economic paradox.
A reversal of this development is not in sight and, according to the book’s results and analyses, it is not to be expected unless the measures proposed therein are implemented. South Korea’s fertility rates, for example, have been consistently below the magic limit of one for the last seven years. In many other developed countries with markedly good PISA results, things do not look much better. If things continue in this way for some time, then several ethnic groups and civilizations are likely to disappear from the earth – not through wars or other catastrophes, but through population decline and the destruction of competences.
The book explains how this disastrous development can be halted and reversed.
Franz-Xaver Kaufmann, Professor of Sociology, Co-Founder of Welfare State Sociology, on the Family Manager Concept:
„The case for professionalizing family activities has much to commend it. Some might argue that the Family Manager Concept further promotes the deinstitutionalization of the family. However, this consistent proposal certainly addresses a dimension that has been largely overlooked in the discussion about the precarious ensuring of the next generation.“
Mein Kommentar:
Fuck for the state with government „support“
„Franz-Xaver Kaufmann, Professor of Sociology, Co-Founder of Welfare State Sociology, on the Family Manager Concept:
„The case for professionalizing family activities has much to commend it. Some might argue that the Family Manager Concept further promotes the deinstitutionalization of the family. However, this consistent proposal certainly addresses a dimension that has been largely overlooked in the discussion about the precarious ensuring of the next generation.““
„Welfare State Sociology“ …
Darf ich Ihnen das Konzept näher vorstellen?
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensborn
Und dann finde ich noch folgenden Kommentar darunter:
„Christian Favre
Ich denke die beste und einfachste Lösung ist: finanzielle Anreize und andere nudges damit mehr Mädchen geboren werden. Die jetztige Ratio von ~108:100 Jungen zu Mädchen bei der Geburt macht es für viele Männer unmöglich eine Partnerin zu finden. Dazu kommt die noch schlimmere Ratio in Indien und China von ~130:100, und die Ripple Effects davon über die ganze Welt.
Und obendrauf kommt noch das reiche und mächtige Männer immer mehrere Frauen haben, offiziell oder inoffiziell, so das noch weniger übrig bleibt für Männer mit wenig Ressourcen.
Bis etwa 1945 wurden überschüssige Männer abgeschlachtet und so das Gleichgewicht wiederhergestellt, heute ist das nicht mehr der Fall.
Ein Beispiel von möglicher Policy wäre: Kindergeld für Mädchen doppelt so hoch wie für Jungen.
So was hätte derzeit keine Chance im Westen, wegen dem Wokeismus, aber in Ländern wie Korea könnte so was hinhauen wenn sie anfangen richtig Angst zu kriegen.“
Was ist los mit diesen Leuten?