Biology hits back:

found here: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2394531/marine-corps-force-integration-plan-summary.pdf

I cite:
ï‚·
of Research Findings
CombatooooooEffectiveness
Overall: All-male squads, teams and crews demonstrated higher performance levels on 69%
of tasks evaluated (93 of 134) as compared to gender-integrated squads, teams and crews.
Gender-integrated teams performed better than their all-male counterparts on (2) events.
Speed: All-male squads, regardless of infantry MOS, were faster than the gender-integrated
squads in each tactical movement. The differences were more pronounced in infantry crew-
served weapons specialties that carried the assault load plus the additional weight of crew-
served weapons and ammunition.
Lethality:
All-male 0311 (rifleman) infantry squads had better accuracy compared to gender-
integrated squads. There was a notable difference between genders for every individual
weapons system (i.e. M4, M27, and M203) within the 0311 squads, except for the
probability of hit & near miss with the M4.
Male provisional infantry (those with no formal 03xx school training) had higher hit
percentages than the 0311 (school trained) females: M4: 44% vs 28%, M27: 38% vs 25%,
M16A4w/M203: 26% vs 15%.
All-male infantry crew-served weapons teams engaged targets quicker and registered more
hits on target as compared to gender-integrated infantry crew-served weapons teams, with
the exception of M2 accuracy.
All-male squads, teams and crews and gender-integrated squads, teams, and crews had a
noticeable difference in their performance of the basic combat tasks of negotiating
obstacles and evacuating casualties. For example, when negotiating the wall obstacle, male
Marines threw their packs to the top of the wall, whereas female Marines required regular
assistance in getting their packs to the top. During casualty evacuation assessments, there
were notable differences in execution times between all-male and gender-integrated
groups, except in the case where teams conducted a casualty evacuation as a one-Marine
fireman’s carry of another (in which case it was most often a male Marine who “evacuated”
the casualty).
3
ï‚·
Health and Welfare of Marines
In addition to performance, evidence of higher injury rates for females when compared to males
performing the same tactical tasks was noted. The well documented comparative disadvantage in
upper and lower-body strength resulted in higher fatigue levels of most women, which contributed
to greater incidents of overuse injuries such as stress fractures. Research from various U.S. and
allied military studies reveal that the two primary factors associated with success in the task of
movement under load are 1) lean body mass and 2) absolute VO2 Max. Findings from the
physiological assessment of GCEITF males and females conducted by the University of Pittsburgh’s
Neuromuscular Research Laboratory include:
o
Body composition: Males averaged 178 lbs, with 20% body fat: females averaged 142 lbs, with
24% body fat
Anaerobic Power: Females possessed 15% less power than males; the female top 25th percentile
overlaps with the bottom 25th percentile for males
Anaerobic Capacity: Females possessed 15% less capacity; the female top 10th percentile
overlaps with the bottom 50th percentile of males
Aerobic Capacity (VO2Max): Females had 10% lower capacity; the female top 10th percentile
overlaps with bottom 50 th percentile of males
Within the research at the Infantry Training Battalion, females undergoing that entry-level
training were injured at more than six-times the rate of their male counterparts
– 27% of female injuries were attributed to the task of movement under load, compared
to 13% for their male counterparts, carrying a similar load. (author: that means the risk for women is 100 % higher then for men)
During the GCEITF assessment, musculoskeletal injury rates were 40.5% for females, compared
to 18.8% for males
(author: again. Women just is double as vulnarable as men)
– Of the 21 time-loss injuries incurred by female Marines, 19 were lower extremity
injuries and 16 occurred during a movement under load task

Only braine dead feminists could be surprised. Why teh … do you think here are competitons for male and female athletes. And how magically should womon get over their biology. And yes it fits perfely to this entry: https://www.q-software-solutions.de/blog/2017/04/liebe-leser-4/

Sorry to say but there are too many idiots out there, which really seem to think biology is just wishful-thinking.To get is straigt, women near you in a fight are more dangerous for any man.

Who could be surprised? Femnazi idiots.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht.