Schlagwort-Archive: dictatorship

My writings

since ages:

This supranational absolutely useless and indeed damaging organizations, with standards hardly bearable for any honest men, are the “hell on earth”. They do commmunicate with dictators and those promise the blue from the sky, get their project and tons of moneys and that from the poor indoctrinated people, of te developed countries. And then it’s get really absurd if countries without anything like civil rights judge about countries which at least have them…

It’s disgusting.

Just give it a name

the disaster can be subsumed under one small sentence.

The problems are there because of the monopolies of states. In this case the monopoly of currencies.

The FED , ECB etc, do just get their position because the state sanctioned it. It’s very easy. Just the Dollar or Euro are the lawfu payment items.
And so there is not market just the big wanter “state”.

The also do nothing against the defraud that banks do lend demand deposits. And so you just whisper bank-run and they get near a heart stroke. This system
is perverted. It does safe defrauders and punishes honest men. And that is called “fair”. It’s obviously just “fair” for those being favored by states. And the state
does do everything to get more and more supporters with bribe.

Give us our money back and we’ll recover. Do more of you interventions and we crash and “recover” therefafter. The first would be the right way but the
Deledefs of alll states, parties will not go that way, it does not suite there “idea” of “fairness”. They are suckers and hell I will name them as such.

Let’s think a little bit

Well maybe thinking is a litttle to much maybe speculate would be the better word.

As you may have read, Euro land is in as deep trouble as the US. It’s an open question who really is the worse, but well that’s another story.

Now we have read a lot of ideas about saving. One of the ideas of saving was a tighter “cooperation”, well it probably is a asked quite much to synchonise 27 different countries, but welll that’s another story again.

But now something changed the ideas slightly. At first Greece is finished. Well just remember the vote then the note vote etc. Anyway Greece just stands for around 350 billions of debt. If you look over Euroland this really is not much. Anyway with the default of Greece bonds french banks will get in knee deep trouble. So far there’s nothing new.

But here we go. The interest Italy has to offer are exploding. We are now well beyond 7%. That means a doubling of your debt in “just” 10 years. Or the other way round with 7% interest and 1.8 trillions of debt (official!!), Italy has to pay interest of 1.8 trillions in 10 years (with 7% interet). No that are as much as 180 biillions a year the budget of italy is well below that of Germany that are around 300 billions. So let’s assume 250 billions. You can see 180 billions are way too much. So saying that Italy is bankrupt also could be seen as fact.

Now as you know ESFS III should be leveareged to over 1 trillions guranteees (which seems to be illusory) just see my entry on my old mises blog at:

So with high likliness this all can not be expected to work. Now the “new” idea is to split up the euro zone into a core zone and a “rest” And now comes the information I found most “revealing”. This is driven by France and Germany. Now we know France and Germany have seen itself as “engines” of the eu process. but guess what the french banks have a hell of outstanding bonds from Italy of around 270 billions!. Now the budget of France surely is in that areas. So if italyy defaults France is “finished” also. They can not bear another 270 billions alons. If you see that with the work on the core europe one can come on some ideas….

Extension to “let’s talk about real” money.

Here we got new attacks on rationality.

Ideas to end democracy

There was a reason that the US did not have a central bank up from the start. There was a reason to not trust paper-money, there was reason to not trust big corporations. All this gone. And Obama does not stop. he does even more to abolisch any rest of responsibility. And Geither just the helpful, just follows suite. People if you think about unfriendly words about deledefs insert them here NOW:

Can one be happy about the death of a man/woman/idea?

Well if you think happy is much to strong. How about being relieved?

Was the day of the death of Alexander the Great, Caeasar, Hitler, Stalin, Lening or you name it a “happy” day? Well I guess it very depends. If you had been supressed or conquered you surely was happy that days. But all in all, you did not know what would come next. Still if the infrastructure of slaughter still was in place (and even aver HItlers death the ward did go on for 4 months. And theses months were terrible for “the normal soldier”. If you’d not been killed by the “enemies” you would end in front of firing squad.

If you did not catch the right timing you were shooten by some own fanatics in the name of the “Endsieg”.

Now can one be happy about the death of Osama. I guess with some assurance at least some were happy that day. But still does it have meant the end of Al Quaida? Surely not. So one devil is gone (which probably is seen as a saint from others) but still Osama happily and readily wanted to kill Americans whereever he could. So anyway I guess many were if not happy quite relieved.

Now if one can be relieved about whom’s death one could be relieved these days? If we see the damage done by fiat-money and central banks. I’d to admit I would kind of be relieved of seeing this entities die. Agreed that are not men directly (because even if E.g Obama or Merkel would be gone, the infrastructure of suppression and misery are still in place. So we would not really win a grain of freedom. Anyway I would be happy to see the complete idea of fiat-money and central banks die. However the days of this fiat-money round are counted. Every new credit for “saving” whatever is just digging a little bit deeper….

So yes I would be happy about the death of central banks and fiat-money. And I would not be happy or relieved but it would be a kind of satisfaction if the current deledefs would have to go…..

Just and unjust wars?

Well what’s so very special about Lybia? Why is it “ok” to go to war with them but why not to  any other dictatorships?

We all know it can’t e civil rights, because they never were a problem in the past and still ain’t a problem with a lot of other countries.  In front of them all China. We even know civil rights are disputable by the US. Or can anyone see anything else but that with Guantanamo.

Now  you may say: It’s the oil stupid. I’m afraid this does not buy you anything. Lybia always has delivered. So no this seems not to be the reason.

Now let’s ask another way. Who started it all. The French “president” Sarkozy. So now we probably come to the real reasons. At first his party is hard pressed by the NP and his popularity is “gone”.  France has as other European Countries too much debt and the population gets older and older. There are not reserves  and so it seems extending the power of France over their “border” and getting hands on somthing as important as the Oil from Lybia is, you’ve to admit, appealing.

If we consider that Politicians (sorry deledefs) are masters of double-speech and double-think. It all falls into places. You say we must get rid of the dictator and let Lybia get “democratic”. Now in the back he probably think: “and well they better get democratic the  “french” way. You probably can say. “Well we the French will help you build up your society” and you can bet they’ll promise sending money. Money they don’t have but you know we just have to take more credit and all is fine.

In return you may come to an “agreement” which allows some government controlled corporation (France is full of them) to exploit the  Oil fields. And suddenly the pieces fall in place. You get some thing people “want” and desire “oil” and you get money and “more” power and control

This sounds reasonable for the french intentions. It does not explain the participation of the US and GB. But GB seems to always be ready to go to war for whatever reason. Maybe it has something to due with “Britannia rule the world” or  the like. One things the least interested country be the US. But I guess they still think of themselves as the “super power”, they have  not get it that they are “loosing” this status. Too much debt and too far extended war areas have brought down every imperial. Just think of Alexander the “Great”, the Persian, the Mongols, Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Russia, Greek, Rome, Germany, Great Britain, France etc.

No super power ever in the world was able to extend their influence above a certain level. And it seems the US are following this route. They simply can not afford going to war “everywhere” they did loose in Vietnam, and well you can’t say they won in Afghanistan. So yes I think they overstretched their possibilities. But seeing that and accepting it are “different” pair of shoes….

There’ can’t be any doubt that Ghadffi is a dictator int the worse sense. He has oppressed all the citizens but those which currently favour him. However the US, and we all will see that getting rid of a dictator does not mean get rid of dictator ship. For that one needs a “complete” defeat as we’ve seen it in Germany. But still after the WW II many of the “high” rollers get high positions in the “new” country also. You know bureaucrats are unflexible if dealing with people like you an me, but are high flexiblity on whom rules they follow. However the Germans were fed up with the nazis, do we know if the population of Lybia is also?


We also remember the US have supported the fundamentalists in Afghanistan as they were on war with Russia. The same which have started their actions in the US. Al Kaida was obviously financed by much of American money, as they were aimable. They spend their money on weapons and brain-washing. And now the US is trying to defeat them… It’s not unlikely that the rebels are  of the same kind. So it seems the US better had not followed France. I bet even if Ghadaffi has gone, we’ll here from Lybia and “terrorists” again. And that after the failed war in Afghanistan. The politician of US and other countries do not learn…..


Just a small question

I’m wondering.

If democracy is that great why do our “democrats” arrange themselves with dictators?

Just see what happens in North-Africa currently. The old “gangs” are simply driven away. Have you ever heard of anything to help them?
It seems silence was more “wanted”. Bahrain is very special case. You remember the bough the F1 circus and suprise they got the football world champion ships…..

Now there still are a few dictatorships around. One of the biggest is flattered like nothing else. It’s just “oh what big a market” there is. Hardly a word about “oh see how nice the suppress their citizens”. Just remember a 25 years ago, the people where killed on a place with “peace” in it’s name. There is but one “renegade” there and they constantly live in fear of war from this “mother country”. It’s Taiwan, do we here of support for Taiwan? Well just as silent as possible….