nun nachdem wir noch mal für die Iren bezahlen dürfen (was kommt danach) und damit es uns nicht langweilig wird und damit wir nicht auf den verwegenen Gedanken kommen unser Geld für uns zu behalten, versuchen sich die „Politiker“ dieser Welt darauf zu verständigen einen Raketenschirm zu bauen. Den Amis war es erst mal zu teuer, den Russen kam es auch nicht recht aber wo eine Delebet da eine Lösung. Gemeinsam gegen die Bevölkerung schweißt Sie alle zusammen. Brave new world….
tripeldoppeltungut
Was soll man noch schreiben?
Irland ist am Ende will aber die Konditionen bestimmen unter denen die EU Irland helfen darf. Europa ist wirklich das Schlaraffenland für Abzocker und was fällt unseren delebets dazu ein? Aber klar doch wir dürfen doch den Euro nicht „draufgehen“ lassen. Es ist nicht mehr erbärmlich es ist jenseits davon…
Hier in der EU dürfen die Betrüger und wirtschaftlich Unbedarften einfach so daherkommen Geld verlangen und unsere Politiker spielen den Drücker. Schaden vom dt. Volk abwenden? Nun ja wenn es uns schadet leidlich wohlhabend zu bleiben, muß man ja dankbar sein, daß einem das Geld genommen wird.
Gesetze sind nur noch da die Betrüger und Banditen zu schützen…., mal sehen wie lange das geht.
But about something completely different. I’m doing quite some Web programming. And have looked into quite a few web development frameworks. There was this question out:
„But Why? Lisp is good. Lisp excels at Domain Specific Languages. Lisp has the REPL for goodness sake. It can’t just be that there are many Lisp dialects / implementations and that it’s a bit hard to get, say, a socket library that works on all of them… can it? I mean, the MediaWiki runs on PHP (I think) and everything I’ve seen or heard about PHP is „…ick…“. So why does the MediaWiki have all the loving goodness and we have the CLiki? (This isn’t to diss the CLiki by the way, it’s cool; I like it but as wikis go there isn’t much there and nothing much has happened to it for ages.)“
his blog is out of order since 4 years. Still there are quite some points about this question:
My take on an answer was:
Lisp and Web Development
why not why?
Friedrich Dominicus response
An essay about why
Gary King write in his blog
Lisp just isn’t there yet when it comes to building web applications quickly and easily unless you want to make it half your own private research project.
But Why? Lisp is good. Lisp excels at Domain Specific Languages. Lisp has the REPL for goodness sake. It can’t just be that there are many Lisp dialects / implementations and that it’s a bit hard to get, say, a socket library that works on all of them… can it? I mean, the MediaWiki runs on PHP (I think) and everything I’ve seen or heard about PHP is „…ick…“. So why does the MediaWiki have all the loving goodness and we have the CLiki? (This isn’t to diss the CLiki by the way, it’s cool; I like it but as wikis go there isn’t much there and nothing much has happened to it for ages.)
So bloggers on Planet Lisp, start your engines please… I’d like several essays from people who know the skinny on web dev and Lisp. Is Joel wrong? Is there a missing secret ingredient? what does Lisp need to come from behind in the web application development language race? After all, Ruby was a dark horse until Rails came along. The best essay gets a prize (to be announced later once I think of something).
Here’s my take on it. I feel I am qualified enough to comment on it. IMHO it boils down to „Simplicity matters“.
What are you talking about
Now even if I get flamed on it. The most Lisp libraries I know of are „application-developer“ unfriendly. Without doubt very clever people have written very clever software in Common Lisp, but they either wrote it for some other very clever people or people willing to spend at least half a year to get into it.
In every other language I know libraries are written to be used by others. They are probably not as elegant and clumsy but one can understand them.
It’s not a problem for me to sit down get the next C library and use it. There may be some problems, but after at least a month of work one got it. Most of the time it’s much easier. Examples for C libraries one simply can use:
*
glib (the naming conventions are strict and it does not take much to simply write down a program)
*
libaprs only trouble spot is getting used too pools. That’s however you learn very fast and you’ll appreciate it.
I could go on with other libraries, hell one even can get the MSDN stuff and apply a lot of it. And this API is not that strict but at least quite strict in it.
The Lisp downside
Try one of the following packages:
* _(clim)
* _(ucw)
* _(cl-http)
* _(cells)
* _(elisp)
* _(cl-xml)
* others
and you feel you are in „no-where“ land. The APIs are not for simply use them, you have to spend half of your life get into them. The obviously are useful and can be used by quite a few. One can not stress that enough. few people can do something in it, few can work with it, few can contribute to it.
Those who can find them obviously easy enough, but most don’t and so this stuff is used by let’s say a few hundreds.
Here some citations from mails I received for a few packages: (names omitted)
I do not use it, because I do not understand it
It’s complex and probably not what you really want….
I do not like anything in that area, so if I had to get into it I would write my stuff alone….
Of course there are counter example but even in the outstanding package of Edi Weitz you have to write:
(multiple-value-bind (mstart mend reg-start reg-end)
(cl-ppcre:scan „(\d+) Windows executable“
line)
whereas I wrote in Ruby e.g
if line =~ / (d+) Windows executable/
Yes, you are right, Edis syntax principally the „cleaner“ one. The stuff has to be stored somewhere, either in some globals or as in Edis package as return parameter, but how much do you have to remember?
Another example: My way to „web-programming“. I do had have to touch PHP code and this code wasn’t convincing. But one could understand it in a few days, and even change that and get to some end in a manageable time span. It has took me more then 2 months to get somewhere with UCW. Yes you can call me dumb, if you feel so, just strange that this dumb person manages it to get into rails in 3 days.
Or: I tried to get into clim for ages, I even paid for a migration of the Present/Accept stuff into the web surrounding. But without the authors help I did not manage to find out why some output was messed up, this has not happened to me in either Rails or OpenACS.
Try to get into CLIM with the given tutorials, good luck.
On the other hand me dumb person manges it to write a gui-application with CAPI in acceptable time.
So why?
Because people can use other solutions.
Well either it’s me who’s not getting it or something is really weird. So let’s put some figures in here.
The IPO has reached around 24 Billion (sorry have not found better figures)
the government has spend 50 Billions on GM before and
around 100 Billion were „outsourced“ to a bad GM „bank“.
Now if we assume the figures about the earnings are right, than we are talking about 3.5 Billion earnings.
Now let’s calculate
100 + 50 = 150
150 – 24(* 0.61) = 126 Billion losses left for the tax payer.
Let us assume GM would pay back 2.5 Billions each year than it would just take around 40 years to pay back
all the money from the government …
I can not see how this can be seen as a big success for the tax payers. So if anyone has another explanation, or can point out my miscalculations.
Please do so. Otherwise I’ve to conclude, the government is even a worse market player than one ever could imagine. I can just see one winner in here, the management of GM, I guess they will earn a few millions this year because of such a „successful“ year.
Maybe it’s not just me. Just read the comments at:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/First-day-trading-of-GM-apf-2339978096.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=5&asset=&ccode=#mwpphu-container
Well they name it euphemistic „safety chute“ and they simple ignore laws they themselves have decided.
Last year it was Greece, this year it’s going to be Ireland. Well the Irish have lived beyond any means and have obviously had a way too high
„growth“ rate in the paste. However the most depressign figure is that that have new debts of nearly one third of their complete balance.
Now Europe will again throw out money, we do not have for problems based on too easy money. An examplary Ponzi Scheme this time the defrauders control themselves and will held every single European citizen as hostage.
I guess you can imagine how angry I am..
Regards
Friedrich
Bailout aber immer doch.
Nun nach Griechenland könnte Irland „dran“ sein. Es gibt noch keine Änderung der Gesetze die Bailouts erlaubten. Aber was schert es unsere delebets. Und wieder einmal beweist sich. “ Wer mehr als einmal lügt, dem braucht man nicht mehr zu glauben“….
Gestern hiess es noch in den Nachrichten, „Irland wird kein Geld nehmen“ und heute:
Rettung? für Irland
Und wer schreit gleich mal wieder am Lautesten unsere OberMafiaSchuldenminister Schäuble. Es ist einfach nur noch widerlich.
Sometimes I’m looking over my other blog, and this is what I found today:
http://fdominicus.blogspot.com/2008/09/watch-closely-what-candidates-do.html
That’s now 2 years ago and so actual…
Why can’t the deledefs suprise me positively?
So in der Mitte dieses Interviews.
Es sieht so aus als ob die gelb/schwarzen Verbrecher abgewählt werden. Was ein Glück.
Wir bekommen zwar den Teufel aber vielleicht dämmert es dann irgendwann auch dem Ahnunglosesten in welchen Morast uns die Politikersirenen gelockt haben. Vielleicht wird dann auch irgendwann mal etwas unternommen diese Parteien zu entmachten.
Ich hoffe stark, daß die FDP nächstes Jahr in BW nicht mehr in den Landtag kommt. Wer soviel gelogen und betrogen hat, sollte die Konsequenzen auch mal spüren.
I wonder who can follow:
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/the-3-reasons-bernanke-can%27t-win-535601.html?tickers=^UDN,^GSPC
Bernanke does the same as Greenspun had did, flooding the markets with money. Well let me ask if
http://fdominicus.blogspot.com/2008/10/fundamenls-misunderstood.html
How should one interprete the following sentence:
„This is monetary policy, not something vital to the future of the world, like, say, who gets kicked off „Dancing with the Stars.“ “
Irony? Sarcasm? Well, if you just read on you read this
„Since very few people in Washington have his back — Democrats distrust him because he was appointed by Bush, and Republicans distrust him because he was reappointed by Obama — the mean girls and guys feel free to lob spitballs at him every time he gets up to speak.“
You can see the author means this literally. It’s unbelivable that this should be true:
„Daniel Gross is economics editor at Yahoo! Finance.“
He does not get one thing straight. And even more unberable:
„Bernanke engaged in plenty of unorthodox activities — taking short-term interest rates to close to zero,“
Just imagine monetary policy is unimportant but in the same arguments he points out what Bernanke has all done. Well if that all is so unimportant why should Bernanke do anything? Why does he even write a sentence about Bernankes actions?
Monetary policy is important and the most important goal of any monetary policy must be to have stable money. he does not even think that, that this is important. So it’s as saying air is not imporant. I guess we should give him a few hours in a cheese cover. If he survives, than I admit my error. Air than is unimportant, if we have to get him out of the cover and he surives than he may have to admit that AIR is important.
More than one big inflation has shown, there are much more loosers than gainers. And it always has shown also. Those having done responsible will have to pay for he others, and a new round of blood-sucking starts. We are surely in a blood bath, and Bernanke has started it.
Well irony get’s a new meaning, this is what I found a Mr Greeenspun has to say:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b6e3d086-ed12-11df-9912-00144feab49a.html#axzz15KXx2tQN
well the economic knowledge of Obama and his Gang is near non existant. Even before the US citizens have voted for Obama I have written, that he does not have an economic expert knowledge.
If you can find my writing about it here: http://fdominicus.blogspot.com/2008/10/keep-this-on-record.html
And he shows this gapping hole again. If he really has said that Germany profits from the „open“ US markets. Well then I’ve some extra news about it for Obama. The German market is (at least for cars) as open as the US market, but people do not buy american cars. And they have good reasons. I bet the Americans also have good reasons to wish for german cars. If that will get more expensive, who will gain from it than?
The other gap is that Obama really seems to believe that introducinb barriers to free trade will do any part anything good. It’s as if you’d say alcohol is good for alcoholics.
I warned you before it all I warn you again. If the Fed and governement do not start striving for sound money, you will all get really poor. You than just can hope to have enough land to grow your own food. If that is what you want just follow Obame. He’ll manage to look this times as heaven on earth….
Vor zwei Jahren habe ich schon gegen all die Failouts geschrieben und angefangen eine stabile Währung als wichtigstes Ziel zu fordern. Nun leuchtet das auf einmal auch Journalisten ein?
http://www.zeit.de/2010/45/USA-Wirtschaftskrise-Bernanke
und zumindest angedacht:
http://www.freiewelt.net/nachricht-5816/neuer-weltweiter-gold-standard%3F.html
Ich bin zwar beim letzeren kritisch weil es so aussieht als ob irgendeine internationale Behörde mit der Währung beauftrag werden soll. Und das ist die schlechteste Konsequenz die ich mir denken kann. Es war nicht ein zuwenig an Kredit was die Krise heraufbeschwor sondern Fiat-money. Somit muß es ganz klar heissen. Weg mit dem Fiat-Geld. Geld das nur durch staatliche Gewalt und nicht durch Überzeugung der Marktteilnehmer Wert erhält ist im Endeffekt wertlos. Und was Papiergeld wert ist kann man ja in der Geschichte nachlesen oder mal einfach nach Zimbabwe schauen.
Oder man schaut einfach wie Bernanke die USA zugrunde richten wird. Statt Sparen zu fördern wird weiter Geld verschenkt. Und so ganz verblödet sind auch die Amerikaner noch nicht, etwas was es umsonst gibt kann nicht viel wert sein… Somit kann man nur festhalten Bernannke bekräftigt diese Einstellung. Was sind schon ein paar hunder Milliarden mehr?
Und ich darf auch daran erinnern ich habe Obama schon vor der Wahl jeden wirtschaftlichen Sachverstand abgesprochen. Es ist müssig darauf hinzuweisen, daß trotz Billonenaufwand die Wirtschaft nicht in Fahrt kommt, es ist ebenso müssig darauf hinzuweisen, daß die Japaner es seit den 90 er Jahren ebenfalls versuchten sich mit der Notenpresse aus der Krise zu drucken. Das funktioniert nicht. Und selbst das haben Obama, Bush und Konsorten (Greenspun, Bernanke, Paulson, Geitner) nicht mitbekommen. Somit ist das (derzeit noch) wirtschaftlich stärkste Land in der Hand von Leuten die von Wirtschaft 0.00000000 Ahnung haben. Und entsprechend sind die Aktionen.
Was die Menschen davon halten kann man unter anderem auch am Goldpreis erkennen es ist inzwischen mehr als 1350 Dollar „wert“. Man sollte wohl ehere sagen mit Dollar kann man sich nicht mehr besonders viel kaufen…, speziell wenn man als Amerikaner ins Ausland geht….
Es soll ja zu einem verstärkten Abschmelzen kommen nur kann ich das auf dieserGrafik nicht erkennen
Nach dieser wäre 2010 das jahr mit der ungefähr zweithöchsten Ausdehnung des Seeeises in ca 8 Jahren… Sehe ich das etwas falsch?
Ok ich habe mich hier noch ein wenig umgeschaut:
http://www.science-skeptical.de/
Und dort kann ich eigentlich nur folgendes erkennen, das Eis um die Arktis wird weniger (spürbar) das Eis der Antarktis dehnt sich etwas aus . Addiere ich die Zahlen grop so hatten wir in 1979 so ungefähr 27,9 Millionen km-² Eis und in 2010 so ungefähr 26,58 Mio km-²
Eine Differenz von ca 1,4 Millionen oder 5%. Was für mich nicht wirklich beängstigend erscheint. Erstaunlich um die Antarktis herum sind 2/3 der Gesamteismenge. Diese Zahl war mir neu.
gestern habe ich in Arte etwas über die Schlacht an der Somme 1916 gesehen. Der I. Weltkrieg war für mich immer weit weg und mein Wissen darüber ist marginal. Ich wollte einmal Verdun besuchen, hab‘ es aber noch nicht geschafft. Ich hatte auch keine Idee wie wenig weit die Deutschen eigentlich in Frankreich einrücken konnten. Aber ein Datum werde ich jetzt nicht mehr vergessen 1.7.1916. Wo Menschen wie Vieh geschlachtet wurden, und wer hat sie dort hingeschickt, die ranghohen Militärs. Ein englischer General sass auf einem Baum 5 km vom Kampf entfernt und versucht von dort per Fernglas den Kampf zu verfolgen. Im Prinzip hatte er nicht die geringste Ahnung was 5 km weiter geschah. Und nachdem schon 2 Angriffswellen von den Deutschen mit Maschinengewehren aufgehalten wurden, hat er in einem weiteren sinnlosen Anlauf noch mal zig zehntausende Briten in den Tod geschickt. Und das war einfach nur grauenhaft.
Bezeichnend: Die deutsche Führung residierte in einem Schloss, die britische Führung auch nicht gerade in einer Hundehütte. Und dann kam ein Kommentar. Der Oberbefehlshaber fragte einen anderen Offizier, ob er denn an die Front wollte um „abgeknallt“ zu werden. Und das war noch schlimmer. Es spielte also keine Rolle wieviele Männer fielen solange es kein „Offizier“ war…. Und so wurden dort in einem Gebiet von ein paar Quadratkilometern eine Million! Menschen ermordet.
It seems putting money on diverse coporations can hardly be seen as „safe“ investment. GM will initiate another IPO, just with the advantage that given promises (pensions plans) are now guranteeed by the „governement“. And here in Germany we have sunk around 18 billons in the Commerzbank and there it’s unsure that tha intereste payments will be done. So much about the lies that we’ll get our money back…..
nach GM werden auch die Steuerzahler bei der CB auf absehbare Zeit ihr Geld nicht wiedersehen. Und selbst die Zinszahlungen werden wohl eher nicht geleistet:
http://www.pressemitteilungen-online.de/index.php/dauerbaustelle-zwischenbericht-der-commerzbank-boersen-zeitung/
War wahrscheinlich besser zu einer anderen Bank zu wechseln.
Meine Einstellung zu Verträgen ist ziemlich eindeutig. Nun scheint es so zu sein, daß es verschiedene Arten von Verträgen bzw Gesetzen gibt. Solche die man einhalten muß und solche die zur Disposition stehen. Interessanterweise können wir derzeit zwei Showstücke sehen.
a) die Rücknahme von Atommüll. Dort gibt es ein Riesenpolizeiaufgebot mit enormen Kosten und
b) Rettungsschirme für schlecht wirtschaftende Länder.
Bei a) werden bestehende Verträge eingehalten, bei b) Gesetze gebrochen.
Es wäre nett zu wissen warum es diese Ungleichbehandlung gibt. Oder geht es einfach nur nach „belieben“. So nach dem Motto “ ach dieses Gesetz. Ja das ist wichtiger und richtiger das andere ist nicht so wichtig.
Man fragt sich natürlich warum es dann die letzteren so gibt…..
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/11/its-official-the-government-isnt-getting-its-money-back-out-of-gm/65591
I’m not suprised the slighest. The pension obligations are gone and they can start afresh and the poor tax payers, has to pay again.
well usually the world is neither white nor black. Now it’s quite different in current politics. Ok agree the Republican have won. So what? They have also voted for all the diverse Bailout plans, especially the first one which was used to sunk 780 Billion Dollars without any effect and without any control. I wrote about it two years ago
see. e.g
http://fdominicus.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-silver-bullet.html
Or just look around that blog for a while.
The big problem is unsustainability an as it’s name implies there is not constant unsustainable growth possible. Fact is without proper saving, investing does not work. And the repulican have not a slightest better record on wasting money. I’ve kept this:
http://fdominicus.blogspot.com/2008/10/keep-this-on-record.html
and it’s obvious that they just were in panic mode. I expect that with all their resources at their hand, that they realize what has been the problem. Nearly none of them has. And so we do not have even grey we just have shadows of black.
especially Bernanke and not to forgot Geithner and last but not least expert Krugman. That they have to suffer under their own decisions. Guess Obama on Medicare or the like. Wouldn’t it be wonderful? Well that will not happen. If the retire they will with something above 10000-20000 Dollar each month. And if Obama follows the „presidential“ path, he well charge you without beeing ashamed a bit 50000 US-Dollar for each speack. Where he will „describe“ the world, and enough big money holders will be stupid enough to hire them. Another interesting finding would be to find the children of them in the public schools. Have you ever dared to ask where the childrens of this „highly respected“ persons are going? Or can you imagine an president waiting a few hours till a doctor comes looking after them? Or even simpler, can you imagine anyone from the family having to shop themselves? I bet if the Obamos go shopping the whole warehouse is closed down, a few dozen bodyguards and policemen will stand in the front of that house and „inspect“ everyone entering that warehouse. One even can imageine a descreet question to the secret services about the sales-persons. This is really „comfortable“, they live in a shell. Which has not much to do with reality of anyone else. Then one surely can talk about great visions and even better so because you know whom to give the invoice. Yes, we need of course this and that and because of „whatever“ we have to higher this tax so much, have an extra fee for that.
Indeed you are really stupid to be a criminal better you be a politician. It will be more profitable and you get admiration and bootlickers and if you live out your sexual desires you just have to look like a sausage dog and tell how terrible sorry you are and the people are goony enough to say. Oh this poor little president, let’s vote for him again.
Do you feel I’m mad about our Deledefs?
The big troubles with our current „Politicians „is that they feel, that just given enough political influence all things will turn out good. This is a big mistake. The most urgent problem is to
give people confidence that they itself can manage their future. Currently they messages are only, if you trust us we’ll help you. Instead of. „Dear people, we’re sorry but some of you have messed up miserably. We see the problems but will refrain from anything about it, and we are sorry that we inflicted political guide lines on you which have turned out to be unsustainable.. We see our errors and will correct them, and stop putting „political correct“ laws an you. We just will start looking for one but one thing. Stable money…..
“
This would be honest and „helpful“. But what they do is just saying. „Well we messed up and put you in misery, so give us more power to help you out this misery. surrender to us, we know what we’re doing“…..
Feel the difference. The base for the GFC is not too less political „messing-around“
Just one other question. Does more laws mean more justice?
Please check the sheer number of laws today and in the past. What’s your finding?
aber gleichzeitig auch zutiefst deprimierend. Manchmal gibt es halt noch neue und anscheinend auch recherchierte Ergebnisse. So war es gestern abend bei Kriegsbeute Mensch. Ich wußte selbverständlich keine Einzelheiten, war aber wenig überrascht und trotz negativer Erwartungen fand ich es dicht einfach nur schlimm. Ja das große und freie Amerika hat seine Soldaten in Kriege geschickt (wie ja im Augenblick mal wieder) aber derjenige der „Pech“ hat und in Gefangenschaft kam wird einfach als „tot“ erklärt. Wie das Ganze aber abläuft war fast schon exemlarisch zu nennen. Robert Greene hat ein Buch herausgegeben:
Gesetze der Macht
exemplarisch vorgeführt vom CIA Chef in einer Anhörung (ich denke es war 1992 also ca 40 Jahre nach dem Korakrieg und nun ja runde 80 Jahre nach dem 1. Weltkrieg. ) Lapidare Feststellung „Mr President möchten Sie den nächsten Weltkrieg anzetteln“. Was soll das wohl ein einigermassen zurechnungsfähiger Mensch zu sagen?
Bingo. Das können wir den „armen“ Leuten ja nicht zumuten. Merke aber als Soldat der tollen USA: „Gehe nicht in Gefangenschaft….“ Vielleicht wäre es am klügsten so zu handeln. „Gehe nicht zum Militär sondern begebe dich direkt nach Washington gehe jeden Tag über Los und lebe leidlich lang und bequem, schaffe keine Wert, tue aber so als ob Du 100% für die Werte Wahrheit, Freiheit stehst. Gebe Deinen untergebenen Zuckerbrot und Peitsche und nehme Robert Greenes Buch als Bibel. Manipuliere, lüge, stehle aber vergiss nicht es geeignet zu begründen“.
Und voila man sehe was unsere Delebets machen.
Es geht immer noch schlimmer:
http://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/vor-g-20-treffen-die-provokation-des-us-finanzministers;2677723
Wieviel Dummheiten darf die Truppe um Obama noch machen bevor Sie des Felds verwiesen werden?
Obama mag intelligent sein, aber von Wirtschaft haben weder er noch sonst irgendeiner aus seiner Kombo irgendeinen Schimmer. die derzeitig größte Wirtschaft …. kann sich dort bald nicht mehr halten. US ist ja inzwischen ein Synonym für SUS …
It would be terrible nice to check out which country was the soundest before the GFC, during the GFC and how will recover most quickly.
And especially what the Keynisiens have to show to prove their points.
Here’s one comment about not beeing Kynesian
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/germany-defies-keynesian-stimulus-and-recovers
However this is far from true for Germany. However in comparison to Japan and US the helps was less. But far from „neglectable“.
What questions I’d like to see addressed.
– how are property rights and well-beeing connected. I have not doubt there is a relationship and this one must be very strong.
– how is stable money and well beeing connnected.
In both areas I’ve a strong opinion. I’d like to see it confirmed or not. Because if there is a relationship and if there is even a strong one. Then we surely can say
the Deledefs have not done well. Then we have to conclude. DESPITE the efforts of them….
But who will dare to challenge them. I bet no-one here in Germany, as you might know every professor is paid for by the governement. And so I strongly assume they do quite some cherry-picking. One of the most dreadful things which have come out of this can you see with the climate hysteria. Even in Germany just a handful professors have opposed the diverse bail-outs, and interstingly enough most of them were not active any longer. And you can see that in Germany the idea of stimulus is heard everywhere.
So who will dare to oppose the Deledefs, who will at least try to defend civil and even human rights. Indeed I say human right. There should be one human right which claims. „a base or human rights is a stable currency“. So we need property, freedom of contract and precious money. If we got that we probably could get along whith this superflouus bureaucrats and deledefs.
was morgen abend in „Kriegsbeute Mensch – wie Regierungen Ihre Soldaten verraten“ in Arte dran kommt. Insgesamt ist habe ich meinen Fernsehkonsum massiv eingeschränkt. Nur wenn ich schon wieder mal unsere Gutmenschen schwadronieren höre, könnte ich schon aus der Haut fahren. Muß nicht sein. Ich picke mir daher immer ziemlich gezielt Sendungen heraus und das morgen verspricht den Richtigen gegen’s Bein zu treten. Es wird zwar nichts ändern, alleine aber das so etwas vorkommt ist schon gut. Das jeder unsere Soldaten von unsere Regierung verraten wurde, ist offensichtlich. Von wegen „Verteidigung unsere Freiheit“… Da können nur Delebets verbreiten
I’ve written about it before. And the same holds this time. I have not really checked the published items. But if just 1/10 of it is true than we are talking about more than 10000 murdered people. This just shows it very clearly what armed forces are all about. The reactions of the politicians are clear. They don’t deny any facts but say every other life of an American soldier or whomever it as stake. As if the life of a soldier from the US would have a higher worth than anyone else. I have written more than once on how armoured forces are behind everything from the governement and this one of the most shabby examples. Agreed it’s war, but this war was put on Iraque by the US. They have send down their soldiers because of the most obscure reasons. How would you feel first be opressed by the armed forces of a dicatator and jus a few years later by the forces of a „democratic“ choosen parliament. What’s the difference, can anyone feel better to see at the point of a gun of a criminal or a „soldier“? Do you feel better that your house is burned than you’d feel if your house is bombed? I’m very shocked and you can bet if I’m glad that this crimes couuld not be kept under the karpet. It does not help any poor soul suffering under this kind of „violence“, but maybe it will open up the eyes of a quite a few others what governement really is.
It’s very simple. They are at the bottom against capitalism and even worse they prefer a sort of dictatorship in the name of the „Environment“. But and this should correctly be written BUT
this does not hold for the members of parliament. And wel they want to abolish personal transport and replace it by public transport means. BUT this should not hold for „important“ members of their party. In fact they are flying around with the aviance attendance as every other politicians too. They are also responsible that Germany is among the countries with the highest prices for fuel. Indeed the fact is that around 70-80% is taxed away… This is due to the „fantastic“ work of the Greens. One could live with it but they want to take the rest of freedom away from us, which is left in this socialiced country. Well you can bet if I will choose them ….
Nach Frau Künast wurden die Hart IV Sätze nicht nach „Bedarf“ sondern nach Kassenlage. Ich frag mal dezent wie sollte es anders sein das nennt man wirtschaften. Der Bedarf ist potentiell unendlich aber die Mittel sind begrenzt also müssen die Mittel sinnvoll eingesetz werden. Ob dies gerade bei Harz IV der Fall ist, darf stark bezweifelt werden. Aber ist schon klar die Delebets wollen sich Ihre Eigene Unterschicht bauen, um einen „verlässlichen“ Wahlhelfer zu haben. Die Grünen zeigen mal wieder das Sie unverhohlen gegen Kapitalismus sind. Und Ihre Grundsätze haben Sie schneller fallen gelassen als eine Strippering Ihre Klamotten. Wer von den Grünen in Berlin wird wohl noch mit dem Fahrrad zum Plenarsaal fahren. Und wer von Ihnen benutze wohl die Bahn?
Aber ist schon klar Wasser predigen Wein Saufen. Es ist wie immer in Oligarchien, wir hier oben Ihr da unten….
Danke Frau Künast für diese klare Ansage.
Grüne sind eigentlich fakisch Rote mit einem größeren Hang zur Diktatur. Nämlich eine Diktatur im Namen der Umwelt, für alle AUßER den Parlamentatiern…
Have you ever considered, why inflation is accepted as something inevitable? Well guess again, it’s not inevitable. Check out the diverse books form von Mises,
Hayek, Friedman and you can see why inflation is the every day robbery of those having control over the money. Even a simple line of deduction can tell you, inflation is
very gladful accepted by well you can say every politician. How comes? Well it devaluates the money. And so if the governements want credit, they issues some bonds. Some of them are very long running (up to 30 years). Now agreed they have to pay interest on it. But if we asssume an inflation rate of 2 % the value of the bond is nearly halfed in value after thos 30 years. So the other half was stolen. And remember you have to pay taxes on the interest also. So if we assume just 1/3 of tax on interest and have a nominal interest rate of 4%, and a „nominal“ inflation rate of just 2% then the calculation is. You have to pay 1.2% of taxes on your intereste 2% is stolen from it so you are left with „astonishing“ 0.8% „gain“. Well you can imagine how nice governements found this kind of stealing. They blame everything else for the inflation rate. But they want more an more credit. Saving in this context does not mean putting aside money, but issuing less credit than the normal BIP grows. This again ist simply a plain lie.
Inflation must not happen. Just imagine the following scenario.
– Reserves are not longer allowed (what does it mean?) Well if you have a reserve rate of 10% you just need 10 Currency Units to lend 100 Currency Units. And well a Bond on one side is an asset on the other side. The other banks lends’s another one the money and see money appears out of the nowhere. No imagine a 100% Reserver. That means you can not lend more than you really have. This is the „normal“ situation for anyone not bank. If you own 1000 Currency Units you can not suddenly borrow 10000 Units. With such a „simple“ approach, all the fuzz which has happened wouls simply vanish, and „too big! to fail can not happen. It’s really as simple as that but no one in the policits and especially the federal reserve banks won’t work on that simple solutions. They will insist on just another few layers of control. And well you can bet who has to pay for it.
– Now imagine a constant money supply. How can anyone get „richer“?. Well for that to see in front of you just check the IT industry. Since their beginnning they have to cope with falling prices. Now if the money supply is constant but the prices do fall everyone get’s richer one day after the other. This would be savers paradise. You know if you just keep your money, you’ll be richer tomorrow and this is reality. But no in the this system would stat it that clearly as long as they are „on duty“. Just see the remaks of Greenspun about gold backed money. Before his time, he was in it. After he get chef, he started printing money.
You may ask how can something grow beyond than? Well it’s „easy“, if something new comes along (like computers) people suddenly start buying these kind of things and are of course demaning less of anything else. And so even with a constant money supply growth can take place. It would be sustainable growth. This piling up of „securities“ as we have seen it just „wishful-thinking“ and unsustainable.
You could choose for a much better future of us all putting pressure on the politicians and bureaucrats. Just demand one thing. „stable money“. If you insist on it and will not get them along with ther lies, you won’t e held hostage for THEIR faults any more…. The only trouble with it is that we MUST comply, otherwise they send us someone along with a gun in his/her hand. Arguing in front of such is simply stupid, if you’re dead or locked away you can not „do anything“ no more. And this is the most depressing news. Your own governement just is nothing more than a Kidnapper. If you do not believe me. Well try the following things. Don’t pay no tax anymore…., try to start digging for something of vale on your own ground, do not accept money issued by the governement no more but insist on anything else. Well you’d better be prepared of some stay on in of the „nice“ prisons of your country. So fact is there is a layer you’ve to feed with any money you accept or spend. So if you buy anything for some currency units, you pay for those making your live difficult…. It’s perfect system of exploitation. And well they all live from your money….