Archiv der Kategorie: Allgemein

Erfolge Bailouts:

Niederschmetternd

Auf diesem Blog schon vor 2 Jahren geschrieben. Wer’s nicht glaubt:
Autisten

Nachdenken lohnt
Schwarze Tage für die Marktwirtschaft

Ach verd…. Schauen Sie einfach durch die Einträge von 2008 an. Sie werden dort immer etwas finden…..

Das ist alles

von http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landtagswahl_in_Baden-W%C3%BCrttemberg_2011
Folgende Parteien wollen 2011 (mit folgenden Spitzenkandidaten) zur Landtagswahl antreten:

* CDU (Stefan Mappus)
* SPD (Nils Schmid)
* GRÜNE (Winfried Kretschmann)
* FDP (Ulrich Goll)
* DIE LINKE (Marta Aparicio und Roland Hamm)
* REP
* AUF
* ÖDP (Bernd Richter)
* PIRATEN
* ddp
* Die PARTEI
* NPD (Jürgen Schützinger)
* PBC
* Die Violetten – für spirituelle Politik
* Volksabstimmung

Na das ist ja eine „Top-auswahl“. Soll ich Teufel oder Beelzebub wählen. Es gibt nicht eine liberale Alternative. Nun ja, dann wird es wohl heißen. SED bis in den „Tod“. Knechtschaft statt Freiheit. Willkür statt Recht.

Bisher bin ich zu jeder Wahl gegangen aber diesmal ist es nahezu unmöglich davon etwas zu „wählen“.

And if you don’t comply

we’re putting off our gloves…

Or is there another motto for deledefs or „leader“. After Tunesia the people in Egypt want „their“ live. And guess what happens?

Well qu’el surprise, the leaders send out the violant forces like police.

And guess what they do not just stand around, but actively beat the demonstrants and if you’re unlucky they shoot at you.

Conclusion: Nice words are for free, the balls are for everything and everyone else.

They layer sometimes is a bit thicker or thinner. Examples for violence against the own population can not just be seen in the underdeveloped country, Just see a few photos films from Stuttgart 21 and you see Germany is not better. And that with our history….

We still are a rats pack of obedient cowards. All kinds of secret police was perfectioned here. And still we believe in the „good“ nature of a fatherlike country….
It’s as if we’d free every murder or worse, give them the guns and ask them to „keep“ the public down…. It seems you just have to ask a German to be a jailor and he/she does whatever barbarous ones wants. It’s probably for something higher….

Shame on you/shame on us

Well there’s the old saying „Trick me once, shame on you, trick me twice shame on me“.

I guess it sounds a bit different in the ears of deledefs. There slogan may be.
„rob you, shame on you“. I have written about the surely illegal actions for Greece and other failout-countries. Fact is the treaty from Lisbon forbids
bailing out, but the deledefs do not care.

Now Greece has even betrayed everyone and corruption is all around. So the money was sunk. I still is going on the billions for „saving“ Greece are „gone“.
The debts still are there, now the raid starts again. This time the debtors should accept lesser debts. So fact is Greece has betrayed, the Greek have robbed every single EU citizen and now we should honor that „betrayal“ with accepting lesser debts. So again wrong is right and right-doers are wrong and have to pay again. This is „justice“ in EU sense.

As written, we rob yous still you are guilty to not support us“.

They know they are wrong-doing, but instead of doing the right things, they put more pressure on everyone and do everything they can do
higher the probability that the „nation“ will stand up against them. They restrict freedom whereever they can an build higher and higher barriers to not get prosecuted…. That’s the „nations“ pride!!!!

What kind of world will our kids see. A world in which betrayal is honored, right doing will get punished. A world where honest work is not honored, it only is a mass for the arbitrariness. Still they will not get any value out-of-nothing. There will not way of printing oneself out of misery. However those having still left some property will have to pay again and again and again…

The notion of „nations“

I really wonder what’s the fuzz about it. I’ve seen a very depressing documentary on Arte about the US civil war. And I was „terrified“. Why was it worth so many debts to „keep it ‚one‘ nation“. Why was it ok to Lincoln to let literally tens of thousands die? What would have happened with two „united nations“? Nothing, the both would have had the same tongue. and they could have lived peacefully side-by-side. But no it has meant killing over any bounds, devastation and desperation on every side. Was it worth it?

They wrote one city heavily under bombardment, has not celebrated the 4th of July for 81 years after this terrible war. I just can say they were 81 years 100% right… The glory of the 4th of July were on tens-of thousand graves….

Let’s talk about democracy

Would you agree if I asked „We all are „democrats“ ….?

Do you?..

Let’s see what it means. Democracy means some figures are the „majority“ and can decide for all. So let’s talk our „beloved“ Germany as example. We have around 80 Millions men in here. Let’s be generous and assume 10 000 000 millions of them are children. They are excluded from every vote. Let’s assume 5 millions are divere foreigners with not voting rights here. So we’re down to around 65 millions. According to the BNN here in BW around 7.8 millions are allowed to vote (with around 14 millions living here) so with all means let’s assume just half the living beengs here can vote. Now how’s it with the majority than?

Now it gets worse. Just around 2/3 of them reall do go voting so we are down to 40 * 2 / 3 = 26.67 millions. Majoritiy? Now let’s see the last voting result CDU around 35 %, FDP around 15% so over all 13,33 millions.

So 13.33 millions do decide for 80 million people. Well I can not see a much poorer picture. Just around 1/8 of the men here, can decide what to do. And it’s getting worse it’s not possible to question their doings. Laws may be abiden , but maybe not. And if you think it can not be worse. There is not way for more than 300 million people to questions the doing of the EU. Because the EU is not a democracy but a partycrocy. (will say just parties of the diverse countries can decide) and then we go down to all member of diverse parties. Which „rule“.

I’m afraid we are have to live after rules from a few thousand people. With hardly a safety net to prevent them intruding our private lifes. These few thousand people have taken all of us hostage and a big machine to shelter them from us. They give orders to those under arms and well they make laws we have to abide to but they don’t. In Germany many laws are just for the „non politicians“….

Even if we’d have Saints as „rulers“. There is the all present threat of using force against you. They make the laws and they own the guns. They will come to your house take and inform you. Well sorry, but this country you own is needed by the „public“ you better be prepared to loose it. Oh yes you can try to fight them, but fact is they have stolen things which were owned by the disfunkt GDR. But the original owners did not get back their property. Another always present threat is simply „go-to-jail“. You won’t abide to pay your taxes -> go to jail, you do not want your children in a public school -> go to jail.

So is this a desirable way of „living“. I’m afraid I disagree.

The base of all living together is to
1) abide to the property of anyone
2) contracts.

If you than just add one simple thing. „Don’t do to others, what you do not want to be done to you“. And we are fine. Current politics means „I know what’s best for you and you better follow“..

So is democracy all that good? I happily conclude: „No“. It just can get a bit better if you always can request the actions of your politicians. We do not have this extra in our Grundgesetz, and the current deledefs do no allow us deciding upon our constituition. (Believe it or not our Grundgesetz is just a provisional arrangement).
</p

Wieder mal einiges los

Gestern ging es mal wieder rund
1) 80 EUR !!! mehr Sparer“freibetrag“. Die Diebe wollen den Bestohlenenn „großzügigerweise“ etwas mehr Geld lassen, wahrscheinlich damit Sie noch rechtzeitig an den Arbeitsplatz kommen können.

2) Eine Sozialdemokrat fragt den EU Präsidenten, „Wie er es fände eine Demokratie in eine Diktatur zu führen““. Das war aber mal nicht PC oder? Und das die Sozialdemokraten gerne eine demokratischen Sozialismus „andenken“; mit von Genossen vorgegebenen „höheren Zielen“ Schwamm drüber….

3) Von der Leyen packt die Peitsche aus, diesmal geht es um eine gesetzlich festgeschriebene Frauenquote in „Führungspositionen“. Wie immer eine typisches Verhalten. „Und seid Ihr nicht willig, gebrauchen wir Gewalt“. Schließlich heiligt „unser“ Ziel alle Mittel

4) Ein neuer Rettungsschirm muß her diesmal sollen die Bauern darunter fallen. Ich schrieb vor ca 2 Jahren http://fdominicus.blogspot.com/2008/12/was-freien-berraschung.html. Ich schlage vor alle Rettungsschirme als „Rettungschampignons“ auszugeben. Die gedeihen super auf Mist und im Dunklen….

déjà vu

Who does remember?

http://fdominicus.blogspot.com/2008/10/they-are-raiding-again.html

 

Just a bit over 2 years ago. Paulson demands 700 billions to his disposal. He got it and the US sunk a few other trillions in „bailing“ out.

 

Now see Baroso and Trichet. There is an illiegal safety chute for the EU (up to 750 Billons) and what do they demand?

 

 

 

 

 

Guess once.

 

 

 

 

 

Guess twice

 

 

 

 

They (Baroso and Trichet) fear a much more stressed Euro. And it just can be relieved by getting

 

 

 

Guess once again

 

 

 

mo‘ money

Insanity ? Sure. sustainable, no. Good idea? no, Will they get the money, you can bet they will.

 

 

The dangers to Tunesia

One can drive away a dictator and strand in a bigger dictatorship than before.

Especially if one believes in those promising wealth and whatever positive you may like.

Just think about it with care. If you allows religion to be he „guide“, war is inevitable. The seam is seeded, the promises of a better „future“ are out. They will tell just with
religion anything will work. If you believe that you lost. If you allow the military to take over you lost also.

There’s but one way to gain something. At first see after stable money, if you believe in promises of plenty of money for everyone, you lost.
If you allow a bureaucracy, you lost.

So there are many ways to loose, and getting it right will be tedious. Fact is:
– If you do not drive away the bureaucrats of your old dictator, you loose.
– If you do not honor property, you loose

You best chance in this crazy times are:
– stable money with real value
– contracts.

See that the contracts of the dictatorship are truly examined. Chances are high that FUD has „done“ it’s share of work. Be very careful to
confiscate anything. If you try to find a scapegoat you loose. There’s not just one of it. The establishment of you politicians, military and bureaucracy, must have
been „kind“ to you dictator. Otherwise they would not get into those positions. If they got in positions of power, they’ve charged you. If you let them get away with it, you loose.
If you let take revenge the better of you, you loose. However if you do not show that you see the bad things having been done for some or many of you, you loose also.

We in Germany have gone through it some 20 years, ago. The peace is flaky, and the wrong-doers are still in high positions. Millions of people did not get any of their property, but everyone is taxed
to build up the mess of the „socialism“. Among others this is a think people feel as beeing wrong. However the establishment of the lefties, does keep their head up and start again, thinking about a
„democratic socialism“.

You can bet after some years or maybe just months have passed, someone will say: „It wasn’t that bad“…
The establishment will fight you on every occasion, if you do not limit its power, you loose.

It’s an extremely tough time. I wish you all the best.

The ever ending story?

I wonder when will we be relieved? Will we ever see the day where debts will not be glorfied? Will we ever come back to serious earning money by providing goods and services, or will we also get
hindered by bureaucrats?

This time Portugal has successfully raised new debts. Is this a success?

Well I ask you if you have 100 000 EUR debts and get another 10 000 is that a success?

Too much debt is the disease not the cure, but who but austrian oeconimics do get that.

I’m sure, the country first to ban debts and introduce real money, will be the land of plenty for „normal“ people it will be hell for „bureaucrats , politicians“ or short deledefs.

What land of plenty would you prefer?

Unwort des Jahres

könnte „alternativlos“ werden

Ich finde das geradezu „alternativlos“. 😉

Scheint es tatsächlich geschafft zu haben:
http://www.freiewelt.net/nachricht-6341/merkels-%22alternativlos%22-unwort-des-jahres.html

Dicht am Optimum …

BNN Nr 9, S.15
‚Die Grabener Grundschule sein eine Einrichtung „nahe am Optimum“. „Was hier geleistet wird, ist nicht selbstverständlich. Das ist beispielhaft und das will ich mit meinem Besuch würdigen, sagt die Ministerin (Anmerkung von mir: Kultusministerin Marion Schick)“. Das Zusammmenwirken von Lehrern, Lehrbeauftragten, Praktikanten und Begleitern aus Vereinen – die Nutzung von Personalressourcen, die nicht aus dem pädagogischen Feld kommen – sei beispielhaft‘

Fehlt Ihnen da etwas?

Ich übersetze in Deutsch: „Es ist ideal die Kinder über den Tag zu kasernieren, dabei spielt so „nebensächliches“ wie Eltern keine Rolle. Wir können ja nicht früh genug anfangen unseren Kindern „professionellen“ Pädagogen zuzuführen…. Ideal wäre es natürlich der Staatsbürgerkunde einen breiteren Raum einzuräumen

what else? ….

debts again. This time it’s not in the US (they are just facing bankruptcy, but don’t worry. they will raise the allowance to make even more debts) but the EU

 

This time it’s again about the PIGS  states. Ireland has taken somewhere around 70 billions, now we have to see what Portugal will take. Of course with the usual tam tam. The have to save and the harshest  sanctions will take place if they will not do this or that or whatever.

 

You know what this is worth. It’s not even worth the typing I do for it. More debt as cure to too much debt. It’s the same old song, we’ve heard for years now. And heaven forbid if we simply allow Portugal to get

bankrupt. The world will come to a grinding halt…

 

 

Auf dem Weg zu weiteren „Einnahmequellen“

Diesmal sind mal wieder die „dummen“ Autofahrer.
Nicht nur, daß man sowieso schon mit jedem Liter Sprit rund 1 Euro an den „lieben“ Staat abführen darf. Nicht das man je nach Hubraum auch noch mal ordentlich ausgenommen wird und, daß man alle 2 Jahre eine weitere Zwangsabgabe entrichten darf, und nicht zuletzt auch mal eben 5-10 EUR für eine absolut sinnfreie Feinstaubplakette.

Nein jetzt möchte schwarz/geld (insgesamt gibt das ein fieses Braun) auch eine Maut für PKW. Nicht das die Politiker unser Geld in den Ausbau des Straßennetzes oder nur die Wartung investierten. Nein, damit werden „soziale Wohltaten“ verbrochen, lies man steckt es lieber in den Aufbau einer immer dickeren „Armutsschicht“.

CDU/FDP sind so was von gutmenschlich, daß es weh tut. Speziell all den Menschen die in „Ruhe“ leben wollen. Ich hoffe ja immer noch auf den März wenn es denn hoffentlich heissen wird FDP weniger als 5%, CDU weniger als 25%, SPD weniger als 10%, Grüne weniger als 5% und Linke weniger als 0,5%. Den rest bekommt hoffentlich eine Partei die liberal nicht nur als Lippenbekenntnis aufweist …

Ja ich weiss, ist nicht möglich, weil es keine liberale Partei gibt. Nur Menschen in Massen also „mit einem IQ“ von irgendwo um -100. Also lasst uns frohlocken. „Alles Heil kommt vom ‚guten‘ Vater Staat“…

If it comes to debt

nobody can beat the USA. The unbelievable sum is somewhere around 14 000 000 000 000 (14 trillions) the new debt every day is a around 4 000 000 000. That are new debt
of around 1 200 000 000 000. And yet it’s not „enough“, As we learned Geither wants the „right“ to make even more debts. It’s interesting, a problem caused by too much debt trying to heal
with even more debt. And we are talking about the „official“ debts, one can not even imagine the diverse hidden debts. Fact is if the Chinese will start selling bonds, the USA is „finished“.

And yet the live as there is no trouble nearby. They initiate programs which are unpayable. But they still pretend it’s „social“ justice. I guess it’s very „just“ if we head for another kind of civil war. Not ever in history there was so much debt out there, which lacks nearly any substance. Sure they’ve build houses like mad and what has happened, they are unsellable. There are regions where you can buy a house for few dollards, but after that comes the gruel awakening. You will get taxed, you will get taxed like mad. And this is „just“? California is bankrupt, and still they are doing as before.

I wonder when they will see that debt richness. Some of the deldedefs are dreaming of the „perpetuum mobile“. It does not matter if money is backed by anything it’s just important to throw out even more money at every problem and steal it from every living men in the US. They think people are so stupid to never realize that debt wealth. And yes the grow up there own lower class, because we know democracy is great and equality is even greater one men one vote is the „most just system imaginable“. If it means having the lower class vote for oneself because of benefits…, than it’s an easy deal

Make saving a „stupid“ thing, make debts the „real“ thing, tax away hard working people and give it to the spongers. And because you do not want to have it that obvious introduce a new bureaucracy which
has to look after the sponger, and say you need this bureaucracy to see that they do not live on expense of the others. This is to keep the honest people calm. Or even better try to make them all addictive. Addictive to the benefits of the great fair nannystate. Give those left right-doers the impression it’s them who are guilty of any poverty and that just the big government can do anything about it.

FDP on it’s way out?

I’m puzzling. Yesterday the probably most important meeting of the FDP has took place. It seems the current point of view is:
„Keep on going, don’t change anything“.

Last vote the FDP got roughly around 15%

During the last two years they have given up nearly everything what can be remote attached to „liberal“. Result in surveys the FDP just gets below 5%.
So I’m quite impressed that going down the drain is that good a way.

I was thinking, that one might see the results of the last votes, and think about why one has seen such results. I was once a supporter of the FDP but after such years, one
can not name the FDP a „liberal“ home any more.

It’s kind of sad but liberal in Germany means everything but liberal. It does not mean see that you get along yourself, take your gains take your losses. No it means kind of socialism for the „rich“.
So liberal means „if it went well“ take your gains if something turns out bad. Well take the tax payers as hostages. Very „liberal“ …

Now we know what’s serious and what not

Germany the land of extremes.

Well I guess nobody else have heard about it there is food scandal here about a substance called (Dioxin). Our public law television institutions have reported about it for more than 5 minutes.

The diverse billions of any „safety“ chute were treated within 10 seconds.

Oh, yeah you have to eat quite a few eggs to take in harming amounts of venom. I just can conclude a bankrupt of our country can’t be more serious than eating a few eggs.

2010 from a liberal point of view

Well now this year is nearly done. Let’s see what has happened with freedom and responsibility.

1) Obama has got his Obamacare which means force and new bureaucratic hurdles. Shell will be saved by politics… So by all liberal means, this just means freedom was diminished

2) the EU has introduced bailouts for nations. That means written contracts were broken deliberately. So another disaster

3) The central banks have made money cheaper than cheap. If you save money you have lost value (again)

All has worked against self-responsibility, the thieves saved themselves with special laws and or have broken them as they like. So one can conclude arbitrariness has grown again. We still have no money of value just more fancy nice confetty, just they (the deledefs) name it „money“

It still can get worse in developed country if one sees the judgement about Chodorkowski. It just shows what we can expect. The Deledefs will make more and more laws and breaking them will get punished ever harder the harder the grip on freedom. The newest attacks on freedom will probably driven by

1) Fear

2) Uncertainty

3) Doubt

1) Fear is easy done, just tell the people that while not following the politicians indescribable bad things will happen. Every new terror attack will be instrumented to surrender more and more to those „who“ know…

2 is even easier. Just introduce new laws and make them very soft. Nobody will know if one is within its bounds or not . Add the possiblity of „instructions“ to it to the bureaucrats than you still can be sure people will get more unsure

3) doubt can be more or easier achieved. If you have uncertainty doubt will raise without further „work“. However as a prudent politician you try taking away doubt with just a few words. „We don’t have alternatives“… I bet this will be one of the most stressed phrase in the near future.

So I’m afraid this year was a disaster for freedom and it surely was against anything just remote connected to liberalism. A few more such years and the breakdown is unavoidable.

to bubble or not to bubble?

this is the question. The Dax is up around 1000 points that are roughly 16,67 %, let’s see what the Dow has done:
up around 1000 points also that are roughly 9.6%. Well let’s see Gold: roughly up 300 EUR from 750 EUR beginning of the year, that are
gains of around 40%. Now is Gold a Bubble? Well it very depends on your point of view. Unfortunately neither the FED nor the EZB, show us a graph of the
money expansion and so we must deduct it from second sources:
http://www.goldreporter.de/wachstumssprung-bei-geldmenge-m3/news/545/ states that M3 grows was beyond 13% in 2004!!. So with all the buying of bonds, one can assume that M3 has grown beyond that limit in 2010. So we never will know really. How much money was generated out of the blue during the last three years and what’s the development of the prices. It could be that gold is a bubble, but it seems more likely that money was bubbled much more. So if we just assume a growth of 8% of M3 in 2009, and 2010. We should have seen a raise in the BIP of at least that much. This has not happened, and so the question persists where was this money spend? It seems very likely the distrust to paper-money has driven many people to buy sliver, gold, platinum.

Now we can bet on the next years. There is not strengthening of money policy in view. Bernanke just wanted to buy another few bonds at or around 600 Billions. in the EU the discussion is on to introduce „Euro bonds“. That are bonds backed up by the EU, backed up by different countries. This suggests that money supply will be plenty the forthcoming future. So I’d think we see another raise in all kinds of assets. (real ones not that funny junk bonds of any EU country or the US).

Where will this bubble end? Well we have learned in 2008 that there is no one-way street to higher prices. And we all know that even the sky has it’s limits. So either the central banks start contracting money or the bubble will burst with a loud bang. I’M very pessimistic that the central banks start acting responsible. I bet they fill follow the lead of the Japanese central bank and government, which now try for more than 10 years printing out there way of their recession. The result is that Japan has the highest rate of debts of all developed countries. And still it does not work. No-one is surprised but the Deledefs and it seem they believe the only way out of debt is collecting more debt..

Well this will not work and if the money bubble will burst, you hopefully have something of real value to trade or pay with. Gold is but one instrument. So I expect an extra raise of the gold price. And I expect it to inflate even stronger the more the central banks try to print us out of this crisis. If the gold prices starts cantering, all bets are off.

I really am curious which country first will draw the correct conclusions. The country which will end this fiat-money madness, will gain everything, people, money wealth. All others will end in misery and this misery has meant war in the past….

Schon interessant

vor ca 1. Jahr schrieb ich.
http://fdominicus.blogspot.com/2009/12/ziemlich-interessant.html

Was muß/darf/kann ich heute auf http://www.welt.de/debatte/article11764126/Klimaforscher-sollten-sich-in-Demut-ueben.html lesen?

Nun ja, es wäre schon hilfreich wenn es wenigstens einer der Klimahysterikern hier mal „Butter bei die Fische täte“ und uns erläuterte wie die Sonne in seinem/ihren Modell berücksichtigt wurde. Wenn die Werte doch unzweifelhaft sind und wenn es doch „wärmer“ werden muss, ist es wohl nicht zuviel verlangt zu erfahren auf welchen Daten beruhen denn die Modelle.

Auch die Qualität der Temperaturmessungen sollte über jeden Zweifel erhaben sein. Platziere ich mein Thermometer im Haus, werde ich wohl kaum die Außentemperaturen messen können.

Auch bezweifele ich, daß wir in der Lage sind alle relevanten Faktoren korrekt zu berechnen oder nur in der Lage zu sein zu beurteilen wie sich gewisse Änderungen woanders auswirken. Was passiert z.B. wenn wirklich größere Eisflächen schmelzen, was passiert mit dem Wasser auf dem sie schwammen? Welchen Einfluss haben die Wolken ? Welche Rolle spielen die Ozeane im Wärmetransport rund um den Globus und was passiert wenn das Wasser wärmer oder kälter wird.

Ich bin nur ein Programmierer und stelle immer wieder fest. Bei Auswirkungen von Codeänderungen liege ich oft daneben. Mein Model ist quasi abgeschlossen, externe Einflüsse spielen keine gravierende Rolle, trotzdem übersehe ich immer wieder Abhängigkeiten. Könnte es sein, dass es Klimaforschern da nicht immer besser ergeht?

Könnte in Betracht gezogen werden, dass man auch einer Art Herdentrieb unterliegt. Das man vielleicht selektiv die Arbeiten liest die der eigenen Vorstellung am nächsten liegen.

Eins möchte ich klar stellen, ich bezweifele nicht eine wie auch immer geartet Klimaänderung. Ich denke aber ein Menschenleben ist wirklich eine extrem kurze Zeit um über Klimaänderungen zu reden. Das Klima auf der Erde ändert sich ständig, es änderte sich radikal schon zu Zeiten als Menschen nur ein Hirngespinst von Bakterien waren, und nüchtern betrachtet muss man auch feststellen: Die Klimaänderungen waren insgesamt so gravierend, dass vielleicht nur 0.00001% aller Lebewesen als Art mehr als ein paar Millionen Jahre existieren. Die gesamte Geschichte der Säugetiere reicht gerade mal „nur“ 200 Mio Jahre zurück, bei einem angenommenen Alter von 4500 Millionen Jahre der Erde also gerade mal 4,4% vom Alter der Erde.

The new „way“

in old times we had dictators. Now we are a bit beyond we have the welfare state. Well it’s not that much a difference. At first the diverse parties have the saying. In Germany we have 4-5 parties and just two which have come into existence the last 20 or so years. The others all keep „social market“ in their names in their Sunday prayers etc. But the all established the most perfidy system in the world and they sell it to us as „without alternative“. It’s the fractional reserver system and on the top are institutions like the FED, EZB etc. They all do but one thing, stealing money from everyone. You don’t believe me. Well then let me ask:: „What’s inflation“ how comes that a US Dollar from just 100 year or so ago is just worth 4 ct.? It must be that way, well that is what they tell you. But it’s no secret they lie openly and not so open. This is still the biggest lie ever invented and hold up. There were times this would be named theft but not since the first world war. From there on we just get fancy colorful paper, no „real“ money was seen since….

And because they have win some time. They can buy with self issued money whatever they like and worst, the central banks buy bonds. And well bonds are an asset aren’t they? And if you have an asset you surely can print another few colourful notes, don’t they? The illusion that it still has some worth buys them time. But in the end we are will pay dearly. but the bureaucrats and politicians. If all will break down and no money will buy you bread, than it’s time for them to establish them as the saviors of the world. They will steal it from those having acted responsible. And so it starts again. At first they will see that markets will be allowed to function again, then comes the tax. And then the promised of the land of plenty. build on debts or worthless money we are doomed to accept as real money. And the round of booms and busts will start. The sums will get absurd and they will alway tell you „Oh no problem we CAN control it.

Believe them and you will pay not one, not twice but forever. See what you have to pay for and see what you really need, draw your conclusions and be wise enough to not buy any bond from anything related to government…..

It starts with

PC (political correctness), then comes the phase off „the democratic forces“ than it goes over to voluntary self-control.
Then it’s blaming everyone not for one self to be „undemocratic“, then comes the end of freedom of press. And from there on it’s not a far way to
the army of National Peoples Army, then comes war, after war just one thing „persists“ the oppressed market.

Does it have to be always that harsh. Is it really a good thing to follow this path again and again and again. Germany is currently in phase 2 – 3.
The press just writes about some people „fighting“ the attacks of the market. Now Hungary is a bit beyond the are on exterminating the press.

It’s not far away to laws for „Rassehygiene“. Maybe it will come the time where you just will see „Arbeit macht frei“… again

Liebe FDPler II

es liegt nicht alleine an Herrn Westerwelle. Es liegt in erster Linie an Eurem Gehabe was mit liberal nichts mehr zu tun hat. Jeder der Herr Westerwelle alleine die schuld gibt darf FDP ab sofort als Feige Deutsche Partei bezeichnen. Sie haben gewonnen weil Sie die einzige Alternative schienen die eben nicht den Weg in den Sozialismus vorantreiben möchte. Es lag hauptsächlich daran Eigenverantwortung zu leben und zu übernehmen. Das habe Ihr alle zusammen (mit ganz wenige Ausnahmen) Entschuldigung „vers….“ Ihr habe Euch nicht gegen sämtliche Failouts gestellt. Hättet Ihr ganz klar gemacht: „Es ist Euer Recht Milliarden zu verdienen, es ist auch euer Recht den Laden dicht zu machen, wenn Ihre eben Milliarden verliert“.

Es ginge Ihnen auch besser, wenn Ihr speziell dem europäischen Rettungsschirm abgesagt hättet. Das alles haben Sie nicht gemacht und ich freue mich, daß Sie die Konsequenzen daraus tragen müssen. Wie ich meinem Bundestagsabgeordneten schon mitteilte, ich wünsche ein freundliches aber bestimmtes Ende an der 5% Hürde. Ich gönne Ihnen jedes Prozent unterhalb der 5.0. Ganz speziell dem 0.001 ten % unterhalb der 5%. Sie haben dem Liberalismus den Kampf angesagt, Sie haben Ihre Wähler betrogen, und viel schlimmer sich selbst auch. Ich gönne Ihnen auch von vollem Herzen, dass Sie mal unter Ihren eigenen Gemache zu leiden haben. Von wegen Wasser predigen aber selber Wein saufen….

Great news …..

for all defrauders or deledefs, the safety chute for the european countries should be made permanent. Yes you know it does not cost a thing. Just any welfare accumulated over time and new playgrounds for laws keeping the bandits safe. Yes it is practical to not have any democratic control, and it’s very convenient that European citizens can not sue governments easily. Especially if it comes to such simple things like expecting that laws are for everyone. Well they are just a little bit special for all politicians. I’m really fed up with this rat-pack.

Boom, Crash, Lüg

Leitartikel aus den BNN auch passend zu PC Journalismus. Ich zitiere die ersten beiden Sätze:
„Die europäische Währungsunion wappnet sich gegen den Bankrott Ihrer Mitglieder. Um den Euro vor weiteren gezielten Attacken der Finanzmärkte zu schützen, beschloss…“

Wer ist schuld? Nicht die Schuldner sondern der Bote der die schlechte Nachricht überbringt. Nämlich: „Eure Schulden sind nichts wert“.

Jeder weitere Kommentar erübrigt sich da. Die Schuldigen stehen fest und es sind die, die „Journalisten“ und Politiker dazu „auserkoren“ haben.

Somit ist klar hier Lebende, dürfen sich „bereit“ machen. Ich empfehle dazu folgende Literatur: „Der Weg zur Knechtschaft“, von Friedrich A. Hayek. Sie erwarten, daß Ihr Eigentum Ihnen gehört, vergessen Sie es. Es gehört den Verteilern, Bürokraten und Schleimern. Wenn Sie mit dem obigen Buch durch sind, empfiehlt sich ein Blick on Atlas Shrugged über das was einen dann erwartet. Aber seien Sie froh, „In the long run we’re all dead“.

Show your face (the real one)

It’s always interesting to see how Deledefs make their „own“ kind of reality. Let’s take using stolen things for something. We can assume it was illegal to send the docs from the diverse places to wikileak. Now we can see interesting reaction: Those publishing that stuff should be jailed or even better killed. The always start babbling about security of whomever. Who has send the soldiers down to Iraque/Afghanistan. Yes indeed the same persons. It is acceptable to harm someone in the name of some artificial construct like a country, but if information is published about the same mission, than this is an unacceptable risk?

Then the very same deldefs accept happily a CD which people supposed not having to pay their (though of „just“ taxes). The even have paid for such a CD. The stuff is stolen, but hey it’s government. They can use whatever they get to put more pressure on their own citizens well this name is kindly phrased for subject.

It’s quite interesting, how you can get to such a brain split. Everything coming from government is good, everything else bad? Every one else knows it does not come anything good from government. You get in touch with them, you will have to pay dearly.

But hey the saying is. „It’s sweet to die for you country“. Why don’t the Deledefs do us a favor and take this sweeties?

Liebe FDPler

da Ihr offenbar merkbefreit seit, versuche ich es mal ganz langsam:
1) Ihr habt die letzte Wahl gewonnen weil es die Leute leid waren für Aktionen andere zu haften
2) Ihr verliert haufenweise Leute weil Ihr diesen Leuten zugemutet habt noch mehr zu haften.

Zwei einfache Sätze dürften auch Ihre Parteispitze verstehen.

Eure Verrätereien umfassen unter anderem:

1) Rettungsschirm Banken
2) Rettungsschirm EU Länder

Die Alternativen waren klar und für jeden einigermassen liberalen zu verstehen
1) Banken Pleite gehen lassen
2) Den EUR sein zu lassen

Keinerlei Aktionen waren von Ihnen zu sehen, warum soll man dann nicht jedwege andere Farbe wählen?

The climate again

well a bad day for nearly every one but bureaucrats and scientists working on the climate warming. For every other there’s bad news. Now the raise of the temperature should be limited to 2 -° C. That means despite scientific doubts, believing in what the majority thinks was choosen. It does not matter if it really get’s warmer, or if man really is the reason. The message is: „Men is guilty of the warming and warming is good“.

I should want to mention that in Germany there was a big discussion about dieing forests. Well Germany still has it’s forests and despite anything else they are growing, and the surely will grow more if there will be less Germans (or people living here). Another thing quite recently. the ADAC (germans largest automobile club) has found out that the so called „Feinstaubplakette“ ( respirable dust) has not made a difference. In cities with zones the air, where just certain cars are allowed to enter, were not better than in other cities. But it has cost every car owner between 5-10 EUR.

It seems we have not sunk enough money into your banks now a few trillion, whatever funny currency name you can think of, play field. What will happen if the temperature will still rais above the 2 -° C. Will they send out the army to kill a few CO2 emittenters? Maybe starting with animals but happily accepting a few dead men as collateral damage? So in the sense of „We have no choice?“

Could not resist

Now something completely unrelated to politics. As I wrote in my BIO I’m still a programmer (and I’ve to admit it’s programmer by heart). I have chosen this profession, probably it’s fits my taste. I like trying out things and I really like to „build“ things. I’ve now spend over 20 years with programming and still like it. Anyway I’ve learned quite a few lessons, and I come to appreciate a few authors, and approaches. There’s one principle in Ruby which I value very high. It’s named DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself). I’m also a big fan of continuous shaping and improving one’s code (the technical term for it is „refactoring“) Anyway some of the software I ship does not hold this principle high. You can tell: „well go change it“. And I’ve to admit yes, I should. And well I do. But I found another acronym for that code. And I can not resist offering it here: RYWYC (Repeat
Yourself Wherever You Can ;-). The code is a sorry mess in that regard. There is code duplication beyond any means. But there is also one quality in it: „It mostly works“. Agreed there are still trouble spots, but there are astonishingly few. And I’m still able to fix them. But it’s not something one should be especially proud of. One could be proud if one cleans up this mess. However this software lacks other essential things also: Tests. and refactoring without tests is like brain surgery with a chain saw…