Archiv der Kategorie: politics

Unsere täglichen Lügen

Schreibe eine Antwort

und unsere permanente Propaganda, vergesse man bitte nicht:

Freut mich, ich hoffe, wir werden die grünen Faschisten und die EU-Faschisten ohne Krieg los.

Man bedenke, was sie bestrafen wollten. Genau das auf das, an was Sie gebunden sind (man muß leider schreiben gebunden sein sollten)
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/art_5.html

Meinungsfreiheit ist in D kein wirklich geschützes Gut mehr. Man kann sogar sagen, es wurde inzwischen sehr selektiv was man (noch?) schreiben/sagen darf und was noch.

Das war früher mal nur ein Ausfall:
https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/parlamentarisches-schimpfbuch-auf-den-strich-gehe-ich-nicht-1.389241

Heute wird eine Tatsache wie Schwachkopf gerichtsrelevant und verfolgt.

Aber so was hier:
https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/NDR-darf-Weidel-Nazi-Schlampe-nennen-article19846096.html

Ist es nicht?

Meinungsfreiheit!

If you think you are the smartest around

Schreibe eine Antwort
NetZero impossibility point? Europe’s renewable wonderland now can’t make solar, wind, batteries or EV’s
JoNova Europe

Then you are probably in for some mockery. We have it with our national team and we have it with the most stupd energy policy in the whole world. All that costs tons of money for nor good and so we get poorer every day. In no country on this earth are Politicians you friends but in Germany they are definitly foes.

Irrefutable logic at work

Schreibe eine Antwort

https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/imported-ford-pickup-australia-could-cost-much-60000-above-msrp

Because of this:
„Protectionism, by definition and design, makes goods rarer and more expensive. The Money-Maker[by contrast] makes goods abundant and affordable, not conserving the incompetent at the expense of the competent.“

http://pc.blogspot.com/2020/08/protectionism-by-definition-and-design.html

It can’t be different….

Flashback

Schreibe eine Antwort

into this blog a bit over a decade ago:
That’s the trouble with lies

This is the trouble with lies. You lie once, and will not loose creditability, twice and you loose a quite a bit more but thrice?

And then you fall back to the same tactics. If not all agree in you lie ? everything will get messed up. Unfortunatly His Insanity has lied more than thrice, and he absolutly makes an impression on not having any clues about reality. And Paulson has alway played down sorrows, “It’ s all ok”, after the first round of lies (no bailouts) again “everything is under control” then comes another bailout and then you hear (that was the last time we’d jume for help) and not three days later he has come up whith this IMHO still braind-dead plan. And always it’s treated as if there isn’t an alternative.

This is how during second 2nd world war soldats were send to be slaughtered and it’s the same in Iraque. If you do not search for alternatives, you surely won’t find them.

They’ve lied to often and that makes it unbelievable difficult to “believe” them once again.
I’d give both some sort of credit if they would put most of what they own to “that plan”. And I’d ask everyone which is for that plan, doing the same. But strange enough that’s not heard from anyone. So how convinced are they “beeing right”, not that much.

Paulsons efforts to get free hand, without any “regulative”, speaks to much of nepotism (especially to this clueless banking collegues), and believing in their risk management seems to be a very bad idea also. So AFAIKT, all the “managers” in charge (for this crumbling corporations) must either agree to step in with their whole property to fix their errors or
give back most of the money they got during the last years, step back and let others try to fix that messs. That would be without example in history, but it seems really strong things must happen to stop this mess.

Even 700 Mrd $ will not make it…..

Now really how many trillions have been sunk and ended up in the balances of the terrible FED?

Something about Paulson

Paulson wants money
free to his service. Ask him to spend 90 % of this figure
2006 Henry Paulson $129,087,000 $34,900,000 $163,987,000

He has “earned” over 163 Millions !!!! in 2006 he surerely can get along with 16 Millions also
IMHO

Same place – my blog.

And guess what irresponsibility is also established practice in banks and very large corporations:

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/Economy/story?id=5876413

Do you remember how much they spend for their wrong-doing, yes I know it’s was the fucking stupid idea of clinton to give credit for people, which never could hope to bear the interests for their it. But hey the bubble has grown and you did not have to have money, you just had to sell early enough, and the last now that the story for F&M And now 12 years later there trillions of more debts, alone budget of the US over 10 trillions added, and I should buy the lies? Just go bac and start reading this entry from the start on.

About Obams to that time:
just can suggest anyone to watch the actions and speeches done by the candidates for president.
None, has come up with some own suggestion. McCain even says. “Let’s put aside politiques”. Can anyone explain it to me what politics than means? Are the politicians just responsible for deciding “unimportant” thngs? And see how Obama ask for the same. “Let’s work together”. Should that look like the decision to go to war?

How comes none of them speak up clealy and state. I’m not supporting this and that and suggest instead something else?

No the dare not come out of their defense. Unfortunatly McCain has no obvious defense. He can not stand behind this suggestion he can not stand against it. How long is McCain Republican?
Obamas positon is as “helpless”. He dares not to let down the economy, and he surely can not opt for this plan as is. If he should win then it would be his task to cope with this surely way beyond a few trillions debacle (who believes 700 Mrd, will make it?)

However now that the could state their ideas precisely, you don’t hear from them. There’s no plan, they are busy with bashing the other for less “delicate” things.

I have to conclude none of them really has some backbone. I hoped it’ll be better with a new president…. I may be terrible wrong

Now if you don’t believe that just go to:
https://www.q-software-solutions.de/blog/2008/09/

Think about it, think about how wrong or right I may have been, and act accordingly. If you feel I was right do stop supporting social democratic parties…

That is crystal clear

Schreibe eine Antwort

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-08-25/hidden-costs-behind-every-government-program

You can read it all, but the end subsumes it all:
„it will always and everywhere ex-ante fall short of voluntary exchange.“

You know it, I know it and I hate it. Before government can spend the money it has to got from the citizens.

Let’s check

Schreibe eine Antwort

My predictions

Now where are we:
1) raising inflation
The price inflation rate still is low, anyway not included are prices for housing and other „assets“ So it has not materialized yet in a broad front
2) Bond won’t raise (time frame around 5 years) or so: Wrong
3) Developing of new bubbles: Right
4) Cuts in maintenacne of the existing infra structure: Right
5) taxes will do raise: True for Germany, wrong for the USA
6) Hindering of free trade: True. More tarrifs for th US-citizens, the understanding that every large coropration has to pay a „fair“ and minimum tax on income in every county. That’s on it’s way.
7) Extending for no choice politics: 100 % right

Now from 7 predictions around just one is totally off. I obviously underestmiated the power of central banks to keep interest down. Anyway I wil not reconsider, it’s as sure aas Amen in church, the intereset will start to raise.

I’m very unhappy and on the other hand furious that 7 tursn out so badly. Freedom since 2011 has go down the drain.  The payment for that will come.

Nun mache ich mal in Deutsch weiter:
Was wir sehen ist ein fast beispielloser Kampf weltweit gegen Freiheit vor Allem Freiheit des Einzelnen. Das ist ein weltweites Problem und nur wenig ist passiert, was dem entgegen spricht. Eine bemerkenswerte Ausnahme: Die Aufnahme einer Garantie für Eigentum in die chinesische Verfassung. Das ist aber auch so gut wie alles was mir bewusst wäre.

Wir sehen die Bemühungen, Bargeld los zu werden und manche Länder sind da weit. Wen es auch eins gib was weltweit zugenommen hat in jedem Land ohne Ausnahme. Das ist die Überwachung und Spitzelei. China hat ein „social scoring“ Modell und wie ich lernte gibt es eine App über die alles Mögliche gebucht und bestellt wird und das wird selbstredend auch überwacht.

Wie sehen weiterhin, daß es mit der Meinungsfreiheit weltweit auch den Bach runter geht. NetzDG z.B. . Was in meinem Vorhersagen fehlte (weil es zu offensichtlich für mich war)
Die Anzahl der Gesetze geht immer noch massiv nach oben und damit insgesamt das Recht zu Grunde. Die korruptesten Staaten haben und hatten immer die Meisten Gesetze und als Liberaler weiß man auch. Ein Gesetz zieht IMMER neue nach sich, davon gibt es nur eine Ausnahme wenn in ein Gesetz Recht einzieht.

Und hier haben wir einen Punkt den man gar nicht genug betonen kann. Die Zurückdrängung von Recht ist ebenfalls in vollem Gange. Selbst auch nur  die selektive Geltung von Gesetzen ist ein massives Problem: Bankenrettungen, Staatenrettungen, Zuwanderung, Steuergesetze:

Fakten die niemand verneinen kann:

1) Seit 1970 ist die Steuerquote von 8 % auf 22,8 gestiegen
2) Die Sozialausgaben erreichten im letzten Jahre neue Rekorde

Weiterhin ist es völlig klar, es wird da noch massiver nach oben gehen, weil nun die Geburtenjahrgänge 50 – 60  langsam in’s Pensionsalter kommen:

Daher füge ich noch 2 weitere Vorhersagen ein
8) Anzahl der Gesetze gegen Rechte werden massiv zu nehmen (Zeitrahmen 5 Jahre)

9 ) Steuern und Abgaben werden massiv weiter steigen (Zeitrahmen 10 Jahre)

Warten wir’s ab und schauen hier immer mal wieder vorbei.

Dear Kiwis

Schreibe eine Antwort

I’m terrible sorry, but your prime minister and her gang decided that you life ist now worth to get defended. So you have a prime minister who thinks you lives do not matter.

For the record: I wrote till now two letter to your PM
„



I know this mail won’t reach you directly, and I hardly doubt that you
even will consider something in it. But it has to be written.

What you are planning to do is not right and unjusst. There is one
fundamental right for any men on this planet – it’s his/her right to
live. And for that self -defense is not a nicht to have but a
fundamental right.

Now I ask you directly. Had have the casualties of the shooting any
chcance to defend hemselves? How could anyone even think that some men
with weapons will be around anytime, anywhere?

Sorry that never ever could happen and never ever will happen. The
simple fact is if the casualties would have had weapons they would
have hade at least the chance for self defence.

You will disallow that. So for me it’s clear it’s your resposnsibilty
from then on, for any casualty inflicted. You doom them to death.

I bet you won’t agree, but the facts won’t change.

My freely given advice is: Don’t do it.

I’ll live long enough to see the results and I won’t forget who was
responsible for that:

With best regards


And here’s the second:

As I thought, it has not reached you or you simply have ignored it.

Now with you change in the laws you are directly responsible for the
coming casuualties.

I’ld like to know how one sleeps who dooms others to thir detaths.

Won’t wish you best regards, that’ll be a lie. I’m not used to lie.

You will not be allowed to defend yourself and your freedom will be diminished in the name of security. So if you get murdered, it’s because your politicians do like it that way?

I’d be so kind and blaze a trail to hell for hear before you’d have to take that route.

Politicians who do not allow for weapons for self defence, are murderers.

Last entry here

Schreibe eine Antwort

Well this blog once was read quite intensively as it was on mises.org. Since then I do not get any feedback any more and so no. I stop posting here.

I was trying not to bother you at all with this blog and tried to deleted it but that does not have worked the Mail with he confirmation has not arrived.

So farewell

May be

Schreibe eine Antwort

but maybe not. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-15/nigel-farage-warns-european-parliament-youre-bigger-shock-2017 At first the surprise must take place. Then the voted for have to do what they wanted to. And then there is Germany – unfortunatly-  – and the surprise will not heat Germany. In Germany I’M certain with around 70 % that it’ll be CDU/CSU/SPD again maybe even the greens will take part.

The interesting questions in Germany are just. How much for the greens and how much for the Afd. CDU and SDP Both will use at least (IMHO 5-7%) to the AfD. So I’s sure we Germany will get really ripped of the next 2-3 years or so.

 

How f….. stupid

Schreibe eine Antwort

do they think I’m?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-11/kremlin-denies-it-has-compromising-dossier-trump-calls-intel-report-complete-fabrica

Gosh, if they don’t have it they are stupid and if they would tell they have they would be even more stupid. Of course they do not have anything – officially.

Does anyone believe the NSA does not have some „interesting“ stuff about Frau Merkel?

And do you really thing they are running around shouting: We do have something about Frau Merkel Me me me me mee….

Bastards: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-11/identity-former-intelligence-officer-who-prepared-trump-dossier-has-been-revealed

 

Dear US citizens

Schreibe eine Antwort

Don’t you think something is fundamentally broken with your political system? With you (in)justice system also? http://satwcomic.com/break-the-bars

How could it be that you incarcerate more than 10 -times as much as other-  the other countries mentioned in that strip?

Don’t you see that your founding papers were all about limiting the power of government? Don’t you see that Abraham Lincoln has broken everything and that it was never ever fixed?

What do you expect if you let you politicians go to undeclared wars? Why you do you think you’ll be more safe if you bring war to other countries? How comes you do not really expect what you get from the „other“ side. Is the other side the terror alone?

Think about it an you’ll have to admit. It your fault also. If you go on with that faults, I promise you the only thing you really get is even more terror?

I write this at the beginning of the year 2017 again. Anyway check how I and other have warned you. Don’t you thin we were more right than any of you politicians?

Well well well

Eine Antwort

I have written:

„So to make end this message. I do think Trump will win with around 55/45 % with a more than 60 % likeliness. So I think Trump will win. I have a bad idea about the goodness for the world of that but I don’t think Hillary would be just a bit better. The choice is in the end none, no one is better then the other and they both are worse for the US and world. So would you rather suffer toothache of headache? Of would you prefer to die by getting shot or getting hanged. Some choices are no choices at all and that is my opinion about them both. None of them is a good candidate …“

See http://fdominicus.freecapitalists.org/2016/07/25/important/

Short comment on this: Hit – sunk

Now something else „post truth“ are the words of the year of the (satirical) Good-doers, there opinion is that is describes the behavior of the voters in the vote for BREXIT and Trump. So yes indeed, all those which have done anything and have not shied away from aggressively attack Trump on every and each occasion. From people who have given Obama the peace noble price – for-  a president who was during all his president ship attached to wars (well they do not name it a bit different – but war is war, and the war of the USA in the near east were and are not just).

How much did we (the Austrians) have warned to not got down that street. To no good. USA form the way of a land in which the single men was granted an exceptional position against government to a totally corrupted country just driven by the government. From a state which should have as less as possible might to an all-mighty state with spying on every one and „establishments“ like Guantanamo. A list of men to be killed just on the behalf of the president and his gang.

A-  country in mass hysterie against anything which limits the power of government. And they choose „post truth“. It’s a totally hitting word for themselves and they do not even realize that. Now if that isn’t ironic – what else?

Soldiers worldwide

Schreibe eine Antwort

say no. Say no to the war drums of your politicians. Disobey and put the politicians and bureaucrats, that want to burn you in the coming wars, into jail. Espeicially US-Soldiers do not follow Uncle Sam anywhere else but into the USA.

Go out of this countries and fight against the ever growing corruption in your own country. If you serve the populations, that is your duty. If you follow you current leaders you are not more then murders or handymen of death.

You are not fighting for your population in the near east you are nothing but state paid killers down there. Was that what you wanted to choose?

May be harsh – ma y be not

Schreibe eine Antwort

anyway it-  seems voting for Clinton get’s more problematic by the day. I guess it’s not to far fetched to expect for Mr Clinton to be even worse as Obama. 8 years president and not a single day of peace with the nobel price peace winner. Now Clinton has supported that, and so another 8 year-  of war are to be expected – the question is where and against whom?

The USA drown in debts, higher deficit then ever, every third Dollar spend from the government comes from new debts. Does anyone believe there will be a change with Mrs Clinton? I could imagine they go on burning earth and men in the near east. Syria anyone? Irak anyone?

Be warned with Mrs Clinton war is the most likely outcome!

I don’t think so about who will gain

Schreibe eine Antwort

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-05-30/higher-wages-workers-help-everyone

You can read it’s for the wealthy. I don’t think so. It’s for those who want the system to stay. Just imagine a different case. Assume that the laws would be in the way to not hinder free trade by any means – hardly any taxes, no tarifs, no laws for any producing corporation, no public health system, no public welfare.

What would that be for the unproductive? That would be their personal hell. If they would have to offer something they probably will earn their living. But can-  you imagine how a „gender scientist“ will get paid for his stuff? What would be a job of a tollkeeper,what would be with thos checking the taxes? They all would not find work in such kind of work. It simply does not yield something. It just burns money.

The really wealthy do have to offer something everyone wants. And so the people do give them their money voluntarily. But agreed it’s even easer if you would not have a choice, and so bribing for large corporations is rewarding.

So the reayl point is that the redistribution runs along the lines from the hands of the productive into the hands of the moocher.

This suits also: http://www.rottmeyer.de/frau-lagarde-als-vorreiterin/ (it’s in German, but search for Bill Bonner and I’m sure you’ll find that in english somewhere also)

 

Time’s starting to tell

Schreibe eine Antwort

something, very easy to understand for any one who likes freedom who knows the base of liberalism in the european sense.-  What’s time telling? „It won’t be different this time“, anyone who does not know what I mean should run to the next shop an see the book „this time is different“ it’s about bankruptcy and states.

All current Systems are very deep social democratic nearing socialism. Freedom is just-  a word they use to describe that you are free to agree with them or go to jail or even worse get killed.

Now see the things Obama really has done to the US. And there’s but one hallmark, soaring debts and being in wars during all the time. Now the USA is at war for nearly 15 years. Agreed the numbers of casualties is low, in fact so low that nobody objects. But soldiers of the US are dying in the non-declared wars, that’s the fact. And the other fact not even the central bank can hide:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staatsverschuldung_der_Vereinigten_Staaten#/media/File:USDept-de.png

The charts stop well in the past but the plus is immense from around 7 trillion to over 17 billions in not just 8 years. That’s the base line of Obamas „achievements“ a total corrupt state, a state which is more orwellian than 1984 and still the same „rulers“. Just remember before the bullets hits you. It’s all for YOUR best, so they told/tell.

Here’s a more actual chart:

http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2012/04/Federal_Debt.png

I’m still around

Schreibe eine Antwort

anyway, the reading frequency here goes against zero. That makes is less intersting to post here. Sometimes one write for oneself, but usually you want to get some reactions. So did I.

Has anything goog happened in the last few months? Not really, the USA goes to war, France goes to war and stupid German goes to war also. Do we have a chance to in anything in Afghanistan? In Syria?

No, the only „win“ we do will have is more dead soldiers, died for nothing at all. And who will survive? Obama and his gang, that’s very bitter and undesirable. What is Obama doing? He wants to minimize that little bit of democracy that is left in the USA. What’s his plan? He wants to take away the weapons from anyone but state paid weapon holder. That’ll work execellent for fighting someone who runs around with a gun killing people.

Does he have considered to read „More guns less crime“. Well I guess you can guess the answer ;-(

So really what’s wrong with you really?

My idea about politicians

Schreibe eine Antwort

They can’t handle it differently. They are all statists. Eveything should be as always and especially they should be ruling. That’s the base line, they want to rule and they have the means of oppression in their hands. And most stupid country inhabitants do not want to abolish them but get kinlike.

That’s the truth, everything else is just propaganda.

I can’t see it differently. Ok the all may be a bit too much, but well overall it’s right and overall the ruling speaks exactly that. We’re all and you’re nothing….